RCE Foto






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Paesaggio con elementi umani
  4. » Prague Dancing House - Fred Astaire & Ginger Rogers

 
Prague Dancing House - Fred Astaire & Ginger Rogers...

Arte e Architettura 1

View gallery (21 photos)

Prague Dancing House - Fred Astaire & Ginger Rogers sent on October 13, 2013 (19:19) by Simone Rossi. 14 comments, 1767 views.

at 13mm, 1/3200 f/16.0, ISO 6400, hand held. Praga, Czech Republic.

#Praga, opera di Vlado Miluni. I due edifici sono un omaggio ai due grandi ballerini Fred Astaire e Ginger Rogers. #FormeGeometriche



View High Resolution 2.5 MP  



What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 196000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarjunior
sent on October 15, 2013 (9:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Good subject, but I do not understand your exif data. Let me explain, as time 1/3200 do not need to absolutely nothing (well, maybe a long exposure with the lights of the car as "trails" would be beneficial to the final result). The diaphragm 16 why?! When you put yourself 6.3 you had to spare ... and finally the noise (due to ISO 6400) that ruins everything

avatarsenior
sent on October 15, 2013 (22:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Rendalf Hello, first of all thank you and Pass your comment.
You are right, actually the result is very "noisy", so I must have done something wrong in the settings of the machine. The problem is that there was a rather peculiar light when I took this picture, the sky was somewhat milky but at the same time there was a lot of light, so I did some tests, and I sped up more and more exposure time, until precisely in 3200, stroke sports photos ... but previous tests were all overexposed ... the diaphragm to 16 I put it to get the nitidizza way down the street, to bring out the bizarre shape of the two buildings making it especially easy to see palaces "normal" that populate the street.
Thanks again for critical comments, these comments are the most valuable for me.
Regards,
BH

avatarjunior
sent on October 16, 2013 (10:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I thank you for appreciating the suggestion is not for everybody ...
However, the next time you shoot in raw ... You can dim the lights and recover the sky "apparently" milky.
To get everything in focus, to those focal just 6.3 to go hyperfocal quite easily!

If you happen you can try another situation like an HDR ... by doing so you have both the sky and the buildings exposed correctly

avatarsenior
sent on October 21, 2013 (11:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Yes you are right, I actually I did double click raw / jpeg and now I was able to change it to the great, with excellent results.
Henceforth scatterò always on Raw.
Just for info, what do you use for PP, photoshop, lightroom or something?
Hello,
BH

avatarsenior
sent on January 14, 2014 (9:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Not bad, although falling lines too obvious!

avatarjunior
sent on January 14, 2014 (9:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Beautiful frame for this interesting building. ..

avatarsenior
sent on January 14, 2014 (19:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Henry and Monica for your nice comments, this building is really a great example of the extravagant architecture, which further enhances the prestige of the city of Prague, architecturally speaking, has little to envy to other more famous European capitals.
Hello and good light,
BH

avatarsenior
sent on January 15, 2014 (8:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Great shot
a greeting

avatarsenior
sent on January 15, 2014 (20:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Mirco, I'm glad you liked it!
All the best,
BH

avatarsenior
sent on April 19, 2014 (13:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The data remains cryptic .. but also wanting to be "different" architecture in the falling lines do not go ..
technically the noise eliminated the impression material that should always be visible ..
a smile
Piergiulio ;-)

avatarsenior
sent on April 21, 2014 (10:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Piergiulio,
on the subject of shooting data of this photo I will not go further because I've already said too much ...
Instead on falling lines, in this case, are not totally agree, especially because the architecture of these buildings, in my opinion, allows an exception to the rule ...
Hello and good light!
BH

avatarsupporter
sent on November 16, 2014 (10:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I like it, too bad it came a little noisy, I do not back the shutter speed and ISO, I would use the ISO much lower working on the exposure time, the picture is beautiful, a nice pdr

avatarjunior
sent on November 16, 2014 (15:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The photo I like a lot, I thought that the noise came out was a desired effect (I would not have explained the choice of ISO 6400). In any case I think the overall effect that comes out is quite pleasant.

avatarsenior
sent on November 16, 2014 (16:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The falling lines do not go because if they did elimineresti the idea that the architect was to oppose its took those physically straight ...
a smile
Piergiulio;-)



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me