Enigmatic gaze | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Macro and Flora

Resize to fit window

1° Regno View gallery (17 photos)

Enigmatic gaze sent on October 12, 2013 (10:23) by Gpierocompostela. 2 comments, 822 views.

, 1/1000 f/5.6, ISO 200, hand held.

5 persons like it: Albertopantellini, Federico Bergamaschi, Quellolà, Roberto1977, Stefano Masala

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Pigi47

sent on October 12, 2013 (20:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Of course that diaphragm with the focus could not be selective on who bigwigs, but I wanted to see with more brightness, perhaps in a vertical shooting. A version of HR might say if the sharpness was correct or not.

Gpierocompostela

sent on October 12, 2013 (21:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Pigi47, and considerations of the passage, or suggestions ;-) --- Look, maybe because they seem too "lean" almost "crippled", or because you do not have the vision to monitor, total, immediate, "lightning" :-D I do not know, but the fact is that they are, unfortunately, almost totally allergic to vertical shots: fconfuso:. --- The HD version I have avoided, due to the fact that there was too much noise at 200 ISO it should not, but it was obvious, perhaps too much. Matter of sensor not great, probably, but it is especially necessary released in recovery of "lights and shadows", from a simple JPEG: Maybe I demanded a bit 'too much. However, the sharpness in HD is very good, considering the handheld shooting. - The "perch" then it was not ideal, on a white so fired up, but "you", had settled there to "pray" and I took the opportunity:-D ;-) -Thanks again, until next time, a cordial greeting. - G.Piero

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.