Untitled Photo | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Macro and Flora

Resize to fit window

Macro e Flora View gallery (8 photos)

Untitled Photo sent on November 08, 2011 (0:01) by Sergio Vicenzino. 4 comments, 1169 views.

, 1/3 f/14.0, ISO 200, tripod.

Dovrebbe essere una varietà di Lycaena...Chiedo conferma oltre che C&C

5 persons like it: Ginno, Giorgio C., Matanò Francesco, Ocna, Pier Mario

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 256000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Massimo Menzaghi

sent on November 08, 2011 (9:57)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

no, è un ninfalide (una melitea o qualcosa di affine, non ho ancora imparato quali siano i caratteri distintivi, si assomigliano molto e ce ne sono davvero tante...)

per la foto la vedo un po' troppo contrastata e la compo mi pare un po' sbilanciata verso destra... ;-)

no, it's a nymphalid (a melitea or something similar, I have not yet learned what are the distinctive characteristics are very similar and there are so many ...)

for the picture looking a bit 'too contrasty and the composition seems a bit' unbalanced to the right ... ;-)

Pigi47

sent on November 08, 2011 (10:48)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Un luce così violenta ha la possibilità d'eliminarti molti dettagli, meglio sarebbe sottoesporre.

A light so strong has the possibility to eliminate you many details, it would be better to underexpose.

Sergio Vicenzino

sent on November 08, 2011 (15:33)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Grazie per i consigli sempre preziosi Sorriso

Thanks for the advice always precious :-)

Ginno

sent on May 27, 2014 (20:11)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Ciao in effetti la composizione manca di parallelismo cmq mi piace lo stesso in particolare le due facce di colore che mostrano le ali una con toni belli colorati e l'altra con toni tenui. Ciao giuliano :-P

Hello effects in the composition lacks parallelism cm ² I particularly like the two sides of the color showing the wings with a beautiful color tones and the other with muted tones. Hello Julian:-P

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.