What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 07, 2011 (18:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I know the location indicated and the wonderful horses that graze there, and when I can, but I like to watch them and take them back. In this shot known digital noise and shot too central, nice the effect of reflection in the water. Conosco la location indicata e i meravigliosi cavalli che là pascolano liberi; quando posso, anche a me piace osservarli e riprenderli. In questo scatto noto del rumore digitale e un'inquadratura troppo centrale; piacevole l'effetto del riflesso nell'acqua. |
| sent on November 07, 2011 (19:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Pleasant the maf, the resume point, the vertical, the soft colors and detail.
I note an abnormal digital noise at 400 ISO for a 1d m III, due to your strong crop or interventions in post-production as Unsharp Mask or cloudy?
Is perceptible but not disturbing the incorrect specularietà reflex (hangs to the left): bodies of water do not deceive. Always check this parameter in pp before posting.
Question: Why did you choose f.4? If you could go back in time again this imposteresti diaphragm or would you try the clearest closing at f.5 0.6-f .6,3 (to 420mm) ... that you will give priority to blur or sharpness?
Returning to the discourse digital noise and blurred if these two features are surmounted, in my opinion, we have an effect that devolution gaze and does not allow us to emphasize the subject.
To explain better you place this reworking soft shot with correct and noise reduction surgery, tell me what you think ;-). hello and good light, laurel
Piacevoli la maf, il punto di ripresa, la verticalizzazione, le soft-cromie e il dettaglio.
Rilevo un rumore digitale anomalo a 400 iso per una 1d m III, a causa tuo forte crop o per interventi in post-produzione come maschera di contrasto o schiarite?
Non disturba ma è percettibile la non corretta specularietà del riflesso (pende a sx): gli specchi d'acqua non ingannano. Controlla sempre questo parametro in p.p. prima di postare.
Domanda: perchè hai scelto f.4? Se tu potessi tornare indietro nel tempo imposteresti ancora questo diaframma o cercheresti la massima nitidezza chiudendo a f.5,6-f.6,3 (a 420mm)... ovvero daresti precedenza allo sfocato o alla nitidezza?
Tornando sul discorso rumore digitale e sfocato se queste 2 caratteristiche si sormontano , secondo me, abbiamo un effetto che deconcentra lo sguardo e non ci permette di enfatizzare il soggetto.
Per spiegarmi meglio ti posto questa rielaborazione soft con inquadratura corretta e riduzione del rumore chirurgico, dimmi cosa ne pensi . ciao e buona luce, lauro
|
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
