What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 01, 2013 (18:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Although the distance you addressed the subject was greater than the normal 180 I usually use, I would have closed the iris more, since the butterfly is already bigger than his, plus can have the wing on the second floor slightly spread apart, so you need more pdc as a major cure in parallel. Anche se la distanza cui hai affrontato il soggetto era maggiore rispetto al normale 180 che solitamente uso, avrei chiuso maggiormente il diaframma, visto che la farfalla è già grande di suo, in più può avere l'ala in secondo piano leggermente divaricata, quindi hai bisogno di maggiore pdc come di una cura maggiore nel parallelismo. |
| sent on October 01, 2013 (20:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I agree with the Buom For, comuque a click pleasant hello ;-) Concordo con il Buom Per, comuque uno scatto gradevole, ciao |
| sent on October 01, 2013 (22:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A subject met recently, very nice and I like her she grande.Di volteggiarsi in 'aria.Bastano few movements to glide saw his abundant wetted area. Without the HD detail does not vede.Al contrast to many other butterflies, prefers partial shade area in the bushes, or low-lying areas of roveti.Mi it seemed a particular detail when I began to study it. F5.6 definitely not allow the very outside of a selective maf seen the position of the wings. A beautiful memory anyway ;-) Un soggetto incontrato di recente, molto bello e grande.Di lei mi piace il suo volteggiarsi nell' aria.Bastano pochi movimenti per planare visto la sua abbondante superfice alare. Senza HD il dettaglio non si vede.Al contrario di molte altre farfalle, preferisce zona in semi ombra dei cespugli, ovvero le zone basse dei roveti.Mi è sembrato un dettaglio particolare quando ho cominciato a studiarla. F5.6 sicuramente non permetteva molto al di fuori di una maf selettiva visto la posizione delle ali. Un bel ricordo comunque |
| sent on October 02, 2013 (0:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Pigi, Tore and Silo for comments and suggestions most welcome, unfortunately with 960mm equivalent. Freehand was not able to do more! PS I accidentally pressed the button I like, however, did not think I would accept also the preference of the author! Grazie Pigi, Tore e Silo per i graditissimi commenti e consigli, purtroppo con equivalenti 960mm. a mano libera non sono riuscito a fare di più! P.S. Ho per errore pigiato il tasto mi piace, comunque non pensavo che accettasse anche la preferenza dell'autore! |
| sent on October 02, 2013 (21:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ Luca55: PS I accidentally pressed the button I like , however, did not think I would accept also the preference of the author! „ How about ...?! Yet ricliccandolo you solve the whole ... You could try ... no!? 8-)
Photo into your standard, mediocre.
Hello ;) " Luca55: P.S. Ho per errore pigiato il tasto mi piace , comunque non pensavo che accettasse anche la preferenza dell'autore! " ...dici!? Eppure, ricliccandolo risolveresti il tutto... ...potresti provare, no!? Foto nel tuo standard, mediocre. Ciao ;) |
| sent on October 03, 2013 (0:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Joeb not know you could fix it, as you can see I did! Thanks for the comment, I am conscious of being a mediocre, but at least not spray, do not move, do not touch, do not use artificial Plamp and backgrounds and those who have ears to hear! Grazie Joeb, non sapevo che si potesse rimediare, come vedi ho fatto! Grazie per il commento, io sono conscio di essere un mediocre, ma se non altro non spruzzo, non sposto, non tocco, non uso plamp e sfondi artificiali e chi ha orecchie per intendere intenda! |
| sent on October 03, 2013 (7:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Your photo was used to argue in this way? Wow! War on plump? To controversies like this would be better to open a blog. La tua foto serviva per argomentare in questo senso? Guerra al plump? Per polemiche del genere sarebbe meglio aprire un blog. |
| sent on October 03, 2013 (12:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Silo No, you misunderstood what I meant, I must make a clear distinction between the photos taken in a completely natural way from pictures taken in sets of posing outdoors, in my opinion it's still life, then obvious that the first will be always mediocre versus the second as the image quality, but the first will certainly have a value nature and the latter no! No Silo, hai frainteso quello volevo dire, secondo me bisogna fare un netto distinguo tra le foto scattate in modo assolutamente naturale da quelle scattate in set di posa all'aperto, secondo me si tratta di still life, ovvio poi che le prime risulteranno sempre mediocri versus le seconde come qualità dell'immagine, ma le prime avranno senz'altro una valenza naturalistica mentre le seconde no! |
| sent on August 18, 2014 (20:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Congratulations :) Complimenti :) |
| sent on August 20, 2014 (17:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks aledipz, very nice! Grazie aledipz, molto gentile! |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |