What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 03, 2013 (18:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I find this unfair! good catch! I am not sure of the components, I might have tried a component on the diagonal .. hello questo lo trovo ingiusto! ottima cattura! non son certo della compo, forse avrei provato una compo sulla diagonale.. ciao |
| sent on October 03, 2013 (18:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Diego, I tried to take advantage of the diagonal but I could not focus well on the caterpillar farther maybe I could help with the diaphragm but I do not know how close! Ciao Diego, Ho provato a sfruttare la diagonale ma non riuscivo a mettere bene a fuoco il bruco più lontano forse potevo aiutarmi con il diaframma ma non saprei quanto chiudere!!! |
| sent on November 07, 2013 (15:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In these cases .. a small step back and maybe a 16.0 f paying maximum attention to the parallelism
however, for me, is a very nice shot ... regardless of the compo
good
hello
Salvatore ..in questi casi un piccolo passo indietro e magari un f 16,0 curando al massimo il parallellismo
comunque , per me , è uno scatto molto bello...a prescindere dalla compo
bravo
ciao
Salvatore |
| sent on November 07, 2013 (18:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Interesting and the discovery enviable, but I think he wanted the whole of the two has made the picture is not perfect, a little 'because the two are also studying too closely and moving a bit' cause you looked clarity on two without being well-head, forgetting, however, the legs and the croissants. Who knows, maybe the suggestion of Infas would yield improvements. Interessante ed invidiabile il ritrovamento, ma penso che l'aver voluto l'insieme dei due abbia reso l'immagine non perfetta, un po' perchè i due si stanno studiando anche troppo da vicino muovendosi ed un po' perche hai cercato una nitidezza sui due senza venirne ben a capo, dimenticandoti però delle zampe e dei cornetti. Chissà, forse il suggerimento di Infas avrebbe portato dei miglioramenti. |
| sent on November 08, 2013 (0:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello raga! Problem was that there were still a moment that's why I used a 13 f who do not usually use I needed a time a little faster, I could certainly raised gl 'iso, but the noise in my car note! Salve raga!il problema era che non stavano un attimo fermi ecco perchè ho utilizzato un f 13 che solitamente non uso avevo bisogno di un tempo un pò più rapido,certo potevo alzate gl' iso ma il rumore nella mia macchina si nota! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
8.7 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
