What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 28, 2013 (19:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Pleasant colors. Point shooting too high and maf advance. The iris open too accentuated the loss of sharpness on the eye. Sin ...: fconfuso:. (Imho). hello, laurel Piacevoli i colori. Punto di ripresa troppo alto e maf anticipata. Il diaframma troppo aperto ha accentuato la perdita di nitidezza sull'occhio. ...peccato . (imho) . ciao, lauro |
| sent on September 30, 2013 (10:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
thank you very much for advice .. unfortunately I was still a beginner at the time of the shot, maybe rifacendola today I stoop to take .. with early maf instead what do you mean?
to confirm the iris open too, if I had I would have taken at least a little closed his eyes, the desire to use the 50cc openings never seen before leads to these errors:-P grazie mille dei consigli.. purtroppo ero ancora alle prime armi ai tempi dello scatto, magari rifacendola oggi mi abbasserei a scattare.. con maf anticipata invece cosa intendi?
per il diaframma troppo aperto confermo, se avessi chiuso un pò avrei preso almeno gli occhi, la smania di usare il 50ino ad aperture mai viste prime porta a questi errori :-P |
| sent on September 30, 2013 (13:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
x maf early intend to focus before his left eye. the pdc being restricted did not then involved. To isolate a particular grant us a good blurred but the next time you could use in f3 ,2-f .4, then keep in mind that moving inaspettatmente then you have to find the iso safety which influence on the shutter speed. As home nikon af recommend a single point af but I keep aiming eye. hello, laurel x maf anticipata intendo messa a fuoco prima dell'occhio suo sinistro. la pdc essendo ristretta non l'ha poi coinvolto. Per isolare un particolare ma garantirci un buon sfocato la prossima volta potresti usare in f.3,2-f.4, tieni poi presente che si muovono inaspettatmente quindi devi trovare gli iso di sicurezza che infuiscono sul tempo di scatto. Come af in casa nikon consiglio un singolo punto af ma continuo mirando sull'occhio. ciao, lauro |
| sent on September 30, 2013 (18:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In fact, I know ke I focused on the beak .. you maybe 800 iso f3, 2/4 I would definitely go well, next we lend more attention .. thanks infatti io mi sa ke ho messo a fuoco sul becco.. si forse a 800 iso f3,2/4 sarei andato sicuramente bene, la prossima ci presterò più attenzione.. grazie |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
14.2 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
