What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 29, 2013 (23:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
He feels the lack of a wide-angle focal as a canon 17-40mm f.4 or a tokina 12-28mm f.4, I would have allowed more interpretations. With a few step back I would have included the 2 bikes completely. Good colors. hello, laurel Si sente la mancanza di un focale più grandangolare come un canon 17-40mm f.4 o un tokina 12-28mm f.4 , ti avrebbero permesso maggiori interpretazioni. Con qualche passetto indietro avrei incluso completamente le 2 moto. Buoni i colori. ciao, lauro |
| sent on September 29, 2013 (23:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I have to relate to the original photo but I'm pretty sure I cut a little ', leaving the constraint, is at the top because there was toppo sky is left because it was too dark, if I had made the best red bike there would be removing the sky and the bike there would be gray by removing the left side of dark ...
It would solve definitely a step back a bit 'more ...
Thanks for letting me see this thing. Devo riguardare la foto originale ma sono quasi sicuro di aver tagliato un po',lasciando il vincolo,sia in alto perché c'era toppo cielo sia a sinistra perché troppo scura, se avessi composto meglio la moto rossa ci sarebbe stata togliendo il cielo e la moto grigia ci sarebbe stata togliendo la parte di sinistra scura...
E un passetto indietro avrebbe risolto sicuramente un po' tutto...
Grazie per avermi fatto notare questa cosa. |
| sent on September 30, 2013 (0:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
ot Keep in mind that the function of a 24-105 is that of all-rounder but that of a 17-40mm is for tight spaces or for this "mission" Photo of immersion in the scene. They are complementary, the 7mm difference in the wide-angle 11mm equivalent translate into well in 35mm (which are not few). Both would share the same 77mm filters.
hello, laurel o.t. Tieni presente che la funzione di un 24-105 è quella del tuttofare ma quella di un 17-40mm è per gli spazi stretti o per questa "missione" fotografica di immersione nella scena. Sono complementari , i 7mm di differenza nella parte grandangolare si traducono in ben 11mm equivalenti al formato 35mm (che non sono pochi). Entrambi condividerebbero gli stessi filtri da 77mm.
ciao, lauro |
| sent on October 15, 2014 (16:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ommamma what a mess! I agree with Lauro on the wide angle, but this kind of images I like, I'm so full of details that we need to look at whole a lot ':-) Ommamma che casino! Concordo con Lauro sul grandangolo, ma questo tipo di immagini mi piace, sono così piene di dettagli che per guardarla tutta ci vuole un bel po' :-) |
| sent on October 15, 2014 (16:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
If I had the 6d behind the 24-105 or 10-20 (which I had at the time) in front of the 50d serbbe come much better!
Unfortunately for every photo a little flaw ...
There is always something better! Se avessi avuto la 6d dietro al 24-105 o il 10-20 (che avevo all'epoca) davanti alla 50d serbbe venuta molto meglio!
Purtroppo per ogni foto un piccolo difetto...
C'è sempre da migliorare! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
15.1 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
