What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 23, 2013 (16:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Colors and composition at the top!
Choice of times, aperture, focus point very uncertain :-|.
Choosing the value of f. very questionable: fconfuso:
Ask yourself what you want to emphasize a model
Focus on the key point: eyes!
If your model is not the mission but the glasses or her lips or her earring focus on them
The whole philosophy of openness at all costs, as you see, it does not pay .. dare to close the diaphragm 8-)
Try to perceive the depth of field in millimeters.
(Imho)
hello and good living, bay Colori e composizione al top!
Scelta di tempi, diaframma, punto di messa a fuoco molto incerti .
Scelta del valore di f. molto discutibile
Chiediti che cosa vuoi enfatizzare di una modella
Concentrati sul punto nodale: occhi !!!
Se non è la modella la tua missione ma gli occhiali o le sue labbra o il suo orecchino concentrati su di essi
La filosofia del tutto apertura a tutti i costi, come vedi, non paga .. osa chiudere quel diaframma 
Cerca di percepire in millimetri la profondità di campo.
(imho)
ciao e buona vita, lauro |
| sent on November 29, 2013 (10:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I find this very nice photo but with an error that the error only compromette.Un:
the left eye in fuoco.Tutto not there.
A smaller aperture would have helped, but maybe even more the point of recovery, being careful to have 2 eyes equidistant from the lens.
Lauro is right: not too fall in love with these super openings .....
A diaphragm 2.8 already gives you a lot of focus. Trovo questa foto molto bella ma con un errore che la compromette.Un errore solo:
l'occhio sinistro non a fuoco.Tutto lì.
Un diaframma più chiuso avrebbe aiutato ma forse ancor più il punto di ripresa ,stando attento ad avere i 2 occhi equidistanti dall'obiettivo.
Lauro ha ragione: non innamorarti troppo di queste super aperture.....
Un diaframma 2,8 ti dà già moltissimo sfuocato. |
| sent on November 29, 2013 (13:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
To help you understand which values ??are at stake pdc with these diaphragms with short distances and which ones SLRs and optics, plays (for PC) with DOFMaster:
www.dofmaster.com/dofjs.html
For Ipad program SetMyCamera
Smartphones for the program is DofCalculator
hello, laurel Per aiutarti a comprendere quali valori di pdc sono in gioco con questi diaframmi a distanze brevi e con qualla reflex e ottica , gioca (per PC) con dofmaster:
www.dofmaster.com/dofjs.html
Per Ipad il programma SetMyCamera
Per Smartphone il programma è DofCalculator
ciao, lauro |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
1.9 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
