JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on February 03, 2015 (6:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I tell my (and since this is the view of a boot patented take it with pliers): the glimpse definitely was very captivating live, but it can not make the feel. One of the reasons I think it is the light a bit 'too harsh (it would seem the early afternoon or so); in these cases, a polarizing filter can give you a hand. Secondly, I find too many things in focus and I can not find anything that draws attention; perhaps opening more diaphragm'd managed to guide the eye on a specific topic (maybe rocks and pine cones on the bottom left) and leave the wood slightly blurry but still distinguishable in the background. Then maybe your intent was just to have everything in focus and I've written a row exaggerated nonsense (which is quite likely given my very little experience), however, refart, this is only my personal opinion and subjective.
Greetings Mirko Io ti dico la mia (e trattandosi del parere di uno scarpone patentato prendilo con le pinze): lo scorcio sicuramente era molto accattivante dal vivo, ma così non riesce a rendere perfettamente l'atmosfera. Uno dei motivi secondo me è la luce un po' troppo dura (sembrerebbe primo pomeriggio o giù di lì); in questi casi un filtro polarizzatore potrebbe darti una mano. In secondo luogo ci trovo troppe cose a fuoco e non riesco a trovare qualcosa che attiri l'attenzione; forse aprendo di più il diaframma saresti riuscito a guidare l'occhio su di un soggetto specifico (magari le rocce e le pigne in basso a sinistra) e lasciare il bosco leggermente sfocato ma ancora distinguibile sullo sfondo. Poi magari il tuo intento era proprio quello di avere tutto a fuoco e io ho scritto una fila esagerata di castronerie (il che è alquanto probabile vista la mia scarsissima esperienza) però, ripeto, si tratta solo del mio soggettivo e personalissimo parere.
sent on February 03, 2015 (15:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
hello thanks mirko comments much appreciated, you're right it was summer afternoon and the light did not allow much, otherwise I was going to set it, then everything in focus, but it's true what you say ... in the end so there is a real person ... I try to return to the site and blur a little 'background ciao mirko grazie dei commenti apprezzatissimi, hai ragione era pomeriggio estivo e la luce non permetteva più di tanto, per il resto avevo intenzione di ambientarlo, quindi tutto a fuoco, ma è vero quello che dici...alla fine così non c'è un vero soggetto... provo a tornare sul posto e sfuocare un po' lo sfondo