RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Portrait and Fashion
  4. » Try again with self-portrait. Understanding errors.

 
Try again with self-portrait. Understanding errors....

...come io mi vedo.....

View gallery (4 photos)



PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




user24517
avatar
sent on October 23, 2013 (16:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

very strong

avatarsenior
sent on October 23, 2013 (18:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Strong ...?? Wow! eh ... but mistakes?

Hello! heather

user24517
avatar
sent on October 23, 2013 (19:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Errors ..., I love it so the picture ;-)

avatarsenior
sent on October 23, 2013 (19:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The photo is beautiful, there is a bit of noise, but I like it, maybe you could not cut the head, so as to give more space to the eyes ;-)

avatarsenior
sent on October 26, 2013 (10:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

hello erica
Meanwhile, congratulations for the "questioning"
and for the condivisione-
apart from the noise that makes the photo cmq not razor sharp,
the MAF and 'fall on the hair behind his right eye and, personally, I also discovered the left eye.
then there 'appearance "emotional"
the look and 'nice
hello and happy WE ;-)

avatarjunior
sent on October 26, 2013 (10:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

very beautiful photos and the subject, they are not able to detect errors can tell you what I tried to do myself. closed a bit of + the diaphragm to have both eyes in focus and also showed that left :-)
I wish you a good weekend
Gigi

avatarsenior
sent on October 26, 2013 (11:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

my impression from absolute beginner .... I try to be honest, excuse me if I say nonsense ....
the noise does not bother me, it could also be a desired effect ....
the MAF a little 'advance and the shutter closed a little maybe they would have benefited
eye covered makes you a little more mysterious and more "wrapped" from your thoughts ....
however I find this very nice shot!
hello
Rusti

avatarsenior
sent on October 26, 2013 (11:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

the portrait and 'very narrow and this can' also be good, if that 's what you wanted to do, but in these situations the area of ??MAF gets a little' more 'difficult to manage, then I would close attention to all those details that draw the viewer's attention, so the position of the hands and the readability 'of the eyes that can convey moods very different, this is the author to decide, but should never be left to chance. so in my humble opinion let see only one hand and one eye could be considered, in a frame so narrow a limit.

luca.

avatarsenior
sent on October 27, 2013 (14:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Brie ..... well ... even imperfect things can please. I agree. Hello and thank you ;-)

Ivancosta you ... the head was not in my intention targliarla, but just do a ritrattomolto close. But I find it really difficult to calculate the size being "shot" and "rush" me back .. wow! Hello!

Thanks Franco .... keep in mind the valuable advice. Hello!

Gigi .... Question: If you were done more to have more fire would not have had the "most veiling" I was looking for. I said a diminished? Wow!
Thank you and hello! heather

Rusti ... hello The result I wanted to achieve is exactly what you described in your personal reading. ;-) But explain to the MAF early ... that's ... wow!



avatarsenior
sent on October 27, 2013 (16:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Just wanted to say that I focused a few inches closer so that stopping down I would have to focus both eyes and the hair on both sides of the face ...
but as Luke just said
in these situations the area of ??MAF gets a little 'more' difficult to manage


hello
Rusti

avatarjunior
sent on January 07, 2014 (23:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Since you've started playing the game ...! We do not play to "right and wrong (I on the other hand I would not have nothing to teach, especially on portraits), but" I like it / I do not like. "In short, I can make the observer. Given this:

I like it more than the first, because there you seem to be looking towards the audience. Here, no, here it seems that you're counting the self-timer beep beep trying to hold back the emotion (and expression).

So what? when comes the third, that I begin to have fun?

avatarsenior
sent on January 12, 2014 (13:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Rusti ....... understand ..... then put it into practice is another matter and I'm a bit 'slow ... wow!
Hello and thanks!

Alberto ...... I also prefer the first as a result. In the second I wanted to laugh ........ :-P ... and I'm preparing for the third: DA Seriously, I never find a time when it can stand on its own!
Thank you and a warm greeting ... erica

avatarsenior
sent on January 12, 2014 (13:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

To make these types of experiment can help you with sw that the manufacturer of your camera to shoot remotely via computer. You put a portatilino next door through which to view the end result in live view, position yourself properly and take ;-)

avatarsenior
sent on January 12, 2014 (14:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

CIA Wolf3d and thanks for visiting and counseling. But since nn are technological expert ..... can you tell me what is "sw"? And how bout the camera and pc? I'm sorry but these things are unfortunately back ... :-|

hello! heather

avatarsenior
sent on January 12, 2014 (15:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

sw = software, professional bias: fconfuso:
I have not had experience with the Nikon software, but Canon offers a program through which you can control the camera remotely when connected via the cable supplied in the kit. It 's so you can use the camera remote functionality including the live view.
If I could do this with the D90 would not longer need to use the self-timer, run to get into position, you would not have pproblemi with the framing, focus etc ...

user18686
avatar
sent on January 12, 2014 (15:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

This is better, clearly, you're on your way.


avatarjunior
sent on January 12, 2014 (15:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Erica, I think you'd have to create an environment a little '+ illuminated so you can shoot at iso 200 (native sensitivity of the D90), avoiding the noise in the shadows (possibly created by the process of post production). Then I pulled out a tuft of hair that covers the eye and distracts from the composition, and finally I would cut across the forehead.
Oh, one last thing, join the fingers, do not keep them away because they distract ...
But the picture is still pleasant! ;-)

avatarsenior
sent on January 15, 2014 (20:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

How many valuable tips ... how nice! :-D

Thank Wolf3d (you can tell that nn are techno right?)

Hello welcome to Alexalex the passage ;-)

The noise Simo80 ..... I guess that's just the iso too high and I had nn lighting options. Thanks also for the other "fixes" .... I will keep these! hello!

avatarjunior
sent on January 17, 2014 (7:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Erica, keep them there, but always follow your way!

user55947
avatar
sent on November 07, 2014 (13:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello ..... start with a quote from Victor Hugo ... "The smile is the sun that banishes winter from the human face" ... and here the sun seems to have entered through a very natural smile. A self-portrait is never easy .... in this case I would have liked a version with both eyes in focus and not just covered and the MAF on the same or on the front of the face. Continue sol smile ..... and every shot will be a success. ;-)



RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me