What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 254000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 15, 2013 (17:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I do not see the subject very clearly. Shooting data complete.? hello and good light with little wind, laurel Non vedo il soggetto molto nitido. Dati di scatto completi.? ciao e buona luce con poco vento, lauro |
| sent on September 15, 2013 (18:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It's not completely in focus, true .. but it was not easy and I focused on the compound eyes of the Weevil. ;) Non è completamente a fuoco, vero..ma non era semplice e ho messo a fuoco gli occhi composti del Curculionide. ;) |
| sent on September 15, 2013 (19:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Athenanoctua wrote: “ It is not entirely in focus, true .. but it was not easy and I focused on the compound eyes of the Weevil. „
You will have tried to focus on one eye, only that it is not sharp. With a few tricks you can, in my opinion, optimize upcoming releases photographic freehand ;-)
The handheld shooting in macro and close-ups are always a certain degree of difficulty, we can optimize the shot if we use the correct technique to avoid our shake-which also includes the control of breathing, daring (as you've done) iso higher around 400-max500, helping with a light source (LED ring flash echo-like Meike FC-110), for those who like you used nikon setting a single point af, and af-continuous since any photographer tends to oscillate with the busand then to change the shooting distance second by second ... finally closing the more possible the diaphragm.
Hence the mini-guide on the shake-:
www.juzaphoto.com/topic2.php?l=it&t=12967
hello, laurel Athenanoctua ha scritto: " Non è completamente a fuoco, vero..ma non era semplice e ho messo a fuoco gli occhi composti del Curculionide."
Avrai cercato di mettere a fuoco un occhio, solo che non è nitido . Con pochi accorgimenti puoi però , secondo me, ottimizzare le prossime uscite fotografiche a mano libera 
Le riprese a mano libera di macro e close-up sono sempre di un certo grado di difficoltà, possiamo ottimizzare lo scatto se usiamo la corretta tecnica per evitare il nostro micromosso che comprende anche il controllo della respirazione, osando (come hai fatto te) iso più elevati intorno a 400-max500, aiutandoci con una fonte luminosa (ring led-flash eco come il MeiKe FC-110 ) , per chi come te usa nikon impostando un solo punto af e af-continuo dato che qualsiasi fotografo tende ad oscillare con il busto e quindi a modificare la distanza di ripresa secondo dopo secondo ... infine chiudendo il più possibile il diaframma.
qui la mini-guida sul micromosso:
www.juzaphoto.com/topic2.php?l=it&t=12967
ciao, lauro |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
