What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
user24002 | sent on September 09, 2013 (22:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
There are no words to describe the beauty of Gaia is an Angel:-P Non ci sono parole per descrivere la bellezza di Gaia è un Angelo |
| sent on September 09, 2013 (22:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you very much, your words fill me with joy! :-)
Samuel. Grazie mille, le tue parole mi riempiono di gioia!
Samuele. |
| sent on September 14, 2013 (20:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good composition. Maf also anticipated here: nose and lips. I have a feeling that you're underestimating the pdc not giving it a value in millimeters. The nodal point of a portrait are the eyes, you have to focus your maf and there still both need to be sharp. How? using a single point of f, by setting a reasonable aperture (hence pdc) and optimizing the technique of shooting and breath.
(Imho)
hello and good light, laurel Buoni la composizione. Maf anticipata anche qui : naso e labbra. Ho la sensazione che tu stia sottovalutando la pdc non dandogli un valore in millimetri. Il punto nodale di un ritratto sono gli occhi, devi lì concentrare la tua maf e comunque entrambi devono essere nitidi . Come? usando un solo punto di af, impostando un ragionevole diaframma (di conseguenza pdc) e ottimizzando la tecnica di scatto e di respiro .
(imho)
ciao e buona luce, lauro |
| sent on September 14, 2013 (23:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello,
here it is clear that the left eye is out of focus, given the aperture I used.
I was quite critical light conditions but did not want to raise the iso more than that. (Maybe if I raised a capellino could not close the aperture a bit :-|)
The picture I wanted to post the same because I like the expression of the child and composition.
Thank you so much for your valuable advice! :-)
Hello, Samuel. Ciao,
qui è lampante che l'occhio sx non è a fuoco, visto il diaframma aperto che ho usato.
Ero in condizioni di luce abbastanza critiche ma non volevo alzare gli iso più di così. (magari se alzavo un capellino potevo chiudere un pò il diaframma )
La foto l'ho voluta postare lo stesso perchè mi piace l'espressione della bimba e la composizione.
Ti ringrazio infinitamente dei tuoi preziosi consigli!
Ciao, Samuele. |
| sent on September 14, 2013 (23:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It is not only his left eye to be blurry but also his right, although to a lesser extent 8-).
In a frontal intake both must be in focus because if they did we would not pick it as a visual disturbance-annoying unless you are advertising needs of the type of the model highlight the earring or the lipstick on her lips.
Noise? You are fortunate to have an SLR semi-professionle that gives you also the villages of iso as 500-640, etc. ..
With 640iso could close the iris by 1 stop and get a shutter speed less borderline.
Close to f.5, 6 was therefore within your reach.
Remember also that the grain in an image in B & N has its own charm ;-)
hello, laurel Non è solo il suo occhio sinistro ad essere sfocato ma anche il suo destro ,anche se in misura minore .
In una ripresa frontale entrambi devono essere a fuoco perchè se non lo fossero noi lo cogliamo come un disturbo visivo-fastidioso a meno che non vi siano delle esigenze pubblicitarie tipo evidenziare l'orecchino della modella o il rossetto sulle labbra .
Rumore? Hai la fortuna di avere una reflex semi-professionle che ti regala anche le frazioni di iso come 500-640 etc..
Con 640iso potevi chiudere di 1 stop il diaframma e ottenere un tempo di scatto meno borderline.
Chiudere a f.5,6 era quindi alla tua portata.
Ricordati anche che la grana in una immagine in B&N ha il suo fascino 
ciao , lauro |
| sent on September 14, 2013 (23:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good advice Lauro. :-)
In the next shooting session housewives (and not only of course) I'll remember, trying to do a better job, I'm very interested in growing.
Thank you very much.
Samuel. Ottimo consiglio Lauro.
Nelle prossime sessione di scatto casalinghe (e non solo ovviamente) me ne ricorderò, cercando di fare un lavoro migliore, sono molto interessato a crescere.
Grazie mille.
Samuele. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
12.9 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
