JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on September 09, 2013 (17:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
If you see the butterfly is slightly tilted, so in addition to a careful parallelism needed a pdc that they can cope with this difficulty. You should take up less space above to donate it to the bottom. Se noti la farfalla è leggermente inclinata, quindi oltre ad un attento parallelismo occorreva una pdc tale da poter far fronte a questa difficoltà. Avresti dovuto tenere meno spazio sopra per donarlo alla parte sotto.
sent on September 09, 2013 (18:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the ride ... But if you wanted more space under the roost would have been too close to the edge of the frame if not cut ... would not disturb more? I agree to the pdc .. Thank you. The prox Grazie del passaggio... Ma se tenevo piu spazio sotto il posatoio sarebbe stato troppo vicino al bordo del fotogramma se non addirittura tagliato...non avrebbe disturbato di più? Concordo per la pdc.. Grazie. Alla prox
sent on September 09, 2013 (20:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ the roost would have been too close to the edge of the frame if not cut „
In all cases the roost would also be cut with the only difference that in the other case would not have had the paw so close to the edge. Evidently, when you want to get rr of a certain type will always cut the roost, or move away greatly from the butterfly, so this will have a lower rr while the roost will remain intact. These are choices that will always make the author. " il posatoio sarebbe stato troppo vicino al bordo del fotogramma se non addirittura tagliato"
In tutti i casi il posatoio sarebbe ugualmente tagliato con l'unica differenza che nell'altro caso non avresti avuto la zampa così prossima al bordo. Evidentemente quando si vogliono ottenere rr di un certo tipo il posatoio risulterà sempre tagliato, oppure allontanarsi notevolmente dalla farfalla, così questa avrà un rr inferiore mentre il posatoio resterà integro. Queste sono scelte che farà sempre l'autore.
sent on September 10, 2013 (11:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I meant that I threatened to cut off the ear dry .. so that remain in the frame .. perhaps the solution to get away in a bit would solve ... hello Intendevo che avrei rischiato di tagliare la spiga secca..che così rimane nel fotogramma.. forse la soluzione di allontanarsi un pelino avrebbe risolto... ciao
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
