What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 241000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 10, 2013 (19:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
not bad:-P non male |
| sent on September 11, 2013 (12:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
thanks grazie |
| sent on December 09, 2013 (21:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Photo not bad for taking up the swallowtail shoulders, you were able to focus well on both the eye and the antenna. Good composition played on the diagonal and the beautiful out of focus.
How would you like the Nikkor 55-300? I was willing to take it even if it did not convince me the rotation of the front lens and the engine does not ring. I threw out a demo of the Tamron 70-300 VC found cheaply which I had read of the flattering comments on JuzaPhoto.
Hello,
John. Foto non male per aver ripreso il macaone di spalle; sei riuscito a mettere bene a fuoco sia l'occhio che l'antenna. Buona la composizione giocata sulla diagonale e bello lo sfuocato.
Come ti va il Nikkor 55-300? Ero intenzionato a prenderlo anche se non mi convincevano la rotazione della lente frontale ed il motore non anulare. Mi sono buttato su un demo del Tamron 70-300 VC trovato a poco prezzo del quale avevo letto dei lusinghieri commenti su juzaphoto.
Ciao,
Giovanni. |
| sent on December 20, 2013 (13:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello John, excuse the delay in responding.
The 55-300 is worth more than it costs, I think, but not so much. From what you say tammy is another world. My Nikkor suffers from front focus to the minimum distance. For the rest over the 200mm is morbidino, the focus is slow, the lens front wheel. The good news is that it costs little, does not weigh much and is not very big. I will do mainly pictures of my children when they play at the summer sea, in the full light of day when I can quit at f / 8 and f/11 have ample time keeping the iso low. So FOR ME is good and does what it must. These photos in the gallery are not the thing for which I took it, it was just an experiment, an excuse to go out on a Sunday after lunch instead of staying at home watching TV. Ciao Giovanni, scusa il ritardo nel rispondere.
Il 55-300 vale più di quello che costa, secondo me, ma non è tanto. Da quel che si dice il tammy è un altro mondo. Il mio Nikkor soffre di front focus alla distanza minima. Per il resto oltre i 200mm è morbidino, la messa a fuoco è lenta, la lente frontale ruota. Di buono c'è che costa poco, non pesa molto e non è molto grande. Io ci faccio principalmente le foto ai miei bambini quando giocano al mare d'estate, di giorno in piena luce quando posso chiudere a f/8 f/11 e avere ampio margine di tempi mantenendo gli iso bassi. Quindi PER ME va bene e fa quel che deve. Queste foto in galleria non sono ciò per cui l'ho preso, è stato solo un esperimento, una scusa per uscire una domenica dopo pranzo invece di stare in casa a guardare la TV. |
| sent on August 09, 2017 (20:49) | This comment has been translated
Very nice! cheers |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
2.8 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
