What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 25, 2011 (18:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
You reposted the photo postprodotta :-) ... what program did you use in the end? The added contrast is OK, but there are still too high lights, did you try to recover? Hello Ivan Hai ripostato la foto postprodotta ... che programma hai utilizzato alla fine? , il contrasto aggiunto è Ok, ma ci sono luci ancora troppo alte, hai provato a recuperarle? Ciao Ivan |
| sent on October 26, 2011 (15:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Apart from the overexposed areas known that there is fire on the craters that surround the shadow line. May I ask how you took the picture? A parte le aree sovraesposte noto che non c'è il fuoco sui crateri che delimitano la linea d'ombra. Posso chiederti come hai scattato la foto? |
| sent on October 26, 2011 (16:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
x Ivan: You've worked with picasa 3, free version has many limitations such as not being able to darken but only lighten, as a beginner I am not yet ready to purchase photo-shop, could you advise me some links useful for computers in photography? hello thanks!
x Ivan: si l'ho elaborata con picasa 3, la versione gratis che ha molte limitazioni tra cui il non poter scurire ma solo schiarire, essendo alle prime armi non mi sento ancora pronto all'acquisto di photo-shop, sapresti consigliarmi qualche link utile per elaboratori di fotografia?? ciao grazie!!
|
| sent on October 26, 2011 (16:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
x Emiliano: unfortunately I cropped the photo so 'losing tripping characteristics :-/ but' what I remember and what I've done with the tripod and the live-view (magnification x10) with the canon 55-250 Maximum Focal obviously MF and I took a stop below! I have done more 'photo of course, but this was the most' in focus! x Emiliano: purtoppo ho croppato la foto cosi' perdendo le caratteristiche di scatto  pero' quello che ricordo e che l'ho fatta col cavalletto e il live-view (ingrandimento x10)col canon 55-250 alla focale massima ovviamente in MF e l'ho scattata uno stop sotto!! ho fatto piu' foto ovviamente ma questa era la piu' a fuoco!! |
| sent on October 31, 2011 (12:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The idea is not bad, but they are blurred and that the tree in front of the Moon: both focus is almost impossible (unless you double posing with two different fires, but you have to be quick as a flash to do so because the Moon moves very fast compared to the horizon), but at least one of the two is better focused. In this case, since the element of the landscape is so interesting, it would be better to focus on the moon, which is also a bit 'over-exposed.
Hello
Clear L'idea non è male, però sono sfocati sia la Luna che l'albero davanti: tutti e due a fuoco è praticamente impossibile (a meno di doppia posa con due fuochi diversi, ma devi essere veloce come un lampo a farlo perchè la Luna si muove molto veloce rispetto all'orizzone!), ma almeno uno dei due è meglio a fuoco. In questo caso visto che l'elemento del paesaggio non è così interessante, sarebbe stato meglio il fuoco sulla Luna, che è anche un po' sovraesposta.
Ciao
Chiara |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
