What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on August 12, 2013 (0:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
To see hires in no doubt ........ I would say great, there is some small little hole and an alignment error on the edge of the wing, the rest really well executed. Try a setting more natural ..........
Ciauz!! Da vedere in hires senza dubbio........direi ottima, c'è qualche buchino piccolo e un errore di allineamento sul bordo dell'ala, per il resto davvero ben eseguita. Prova un'ambientazione più naturale.......... Ciauz!!!! |
| sent on August 12, 2013 (8:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I think you can do this test you have missed an opportunity perhaps unique. In my opinion I would try just one shot trying to get the maximum parallelism for good sharpness, taking advantage of the full reflection of the subject. A thing of this kind do not happen every day. Personal observation. True that now make more shots and then merge them has become a fashion, but I can see well in difficult subjects for their morphology to obtain a valid pdc to make them completely clear, or in quegl'ingrandimenti where pdc is really narrow, but on a butterfly of this type would prefer to take better care in the return as a single click and have a clearer picture as well as interesting. Without offense, mine is a simple chat bar. :-) Penso che per compiere questa prova hai perso un'occasione forse unica. A mio avviso avrei tentato un solo scatto cercando d'ottenere il massimo parallelismo per una buona nitidezza, sfruttando per intero il riflesso del soggetto. Una cosa di questo genere non capita tutti i giorni. Osservazione personale. Vero che ormai compiere più scatti per poi fonderli è diventata una moda, ma questo lo vedo bene in soggetti difficoltosi per loro morfologia ad ottenere una pdc valida a renderli completamente nitidi, oppure in quegl'ingrandimenti dove la pdc è veramente risicata, ma su una farfallina di questo tipo preferirei curare maggiormente il singolo scatto ed avere come ritorno un'immagine più nitida oltre che interessante. Senza offese, la mia è una semplice chiacchiera da bar. |
| sent on August 12, 2013 (11:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I especially like the polished surface on which it was laid. A me in particolare piace molto il piano lucido su cui era posata. |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |