What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 17, 2013 (17:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The hard struggle for survival! Excellent recovery, conveys this concept very well! La dura lotta per la sopravvivenza! Ottima ripresa, trasmette molto bene questo concetto! |
| sent on September 20, 2013 (11:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Technophil. It 'was the first meeting nell'Etosha. We joined for a while '. I have other shots cute. We have the illusion that everything would have been so. Of hyenas, however, we do not have more views, and lions only one. But the Etosha was a great experience anyway. Grazie Technophil. E' stato il primo incontro nell'Etosha. L'abbiamo affiancata per un po'. Ho altri scatti carini. Ci ha illuso che sarebbe stato tutto così. Di iene, invece, non ne abbiamo più viste, e di leoni solo uno. Ma l'Etosha è stata un'esperienza magnifica comunque. |
| sent on October 19, 2014 (19:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I really like the pose and the background predatory semi-desert. If I can, how it behaves in terms of speed and sharpness of the MAF 70-200 with the 1.4x III? Mi piace molto la posa predatoria e lo sfondo semi desertico. Se posso, come si comporta a livello di velocità MAF e nitidezza il 70-200 con l'1.4x III? |
| sent on November 26, 2014 (13:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Sorry I'm late, I see now the question. I both multipliers. To speed MAF would say they are very good, in the limited use that I do not have nothing to complain. On the sharpness: everyone is excited. I see a difference in sharpness with 2x, but we do not put your hands on the fire: clearly lost 2 stop are felt and, photographing freehand, as the stabilizer must do its part, it becomes difficult for me to keep all that weight stationary.
The magnification given dall'1.4 unfortunately is quite limited. This summer I took some pictures naturalistic 400 with 2x and the easel, at a great distance (with final crop so well). Of sharp photos I have obtained several.
But they are not sufficiently expert to give an opinion truly significant. Scusa il ritardo, vedo ora la domanda. Ho entrambi i moltiplicatori. Per velocità MAF direi che sono ottimi, nell'uso limitato che ne faccio io non ho nulla da eccepire. Sulla nitidezza: tutti sono entusiasti. Io vedo qualche differenza nella nitidezza col 2x, ma non ci metterei le mani sul fuoco: chiaramente i 2 stop persi si fanno sentire e, fotografando a mano libera, per quanto lo stabilizzatore faccia la sua parte, diventa difficile per me tenere tutto quel peso fermo.
L'ingrandimento dato dall'1.4 purtroppo è abbastanza limitato. Quest'estate ho fatto qualche foto naturalistica a 400 con il 2x ed il cavalletto, a grande distanza (con quindi pure crop finale). Di foto nitide ne ho ottenute parecchie.
Ma non sono sufficientemente esperto per darti un parere veramente significativo. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
2.8 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
