JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
user6267
sent on September 11, 2013 (13:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Sorry for the incompetence ... but the lack of clarity on the headland in the background is due to the use of the filter?
thank you very much and see you soon!
hello Scusami per l'incompetenza... ma la scarsa nitidezza sul promontorio sullo sfondo è dovuta all'uso del filtro?
sent on September 11, 2013 (16:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Felux. No. If it was because of the drop in sharpness filter would be evident throughout the frame and not just the background. I think it's a combination of several factors that I try to list: First an inefficient performance of the 16-35 to the extreme edges (the cape is right there) The second factor I think is due to the fact that, by choice, are quite delicate with the unsharp mask. I do not like the photos too sharp because I find them a bit 'artificial. The third reason could be an ideal choice not the point of focus, even if it seems strange that one of the real reasons why this might be. In general I always check by pressing the Preview button of depth of field that the entire frame is in focus. Furthermore the central part of the promontory is significantly sharper in the lateral part. Maybe at home controller ò, the original file! Hello, Diego. Ciao Felux. No. Se fosse causa del filtro il calo di nitidezza sarebbe evidente su tutto il frame e non solo sullo sfondo. Penso sia la combinazione di più fattori che provo ad elencare: In primo luogo una resa non ottimale del 16-35 ai bordi estremi (il promontorio si trova proprio li) Il secondo fattore penso sia dovuto al fatto che, per scelta, sono piuttosto delicato con la maschera di contrasto. Non amo le foto eccessivamente nitide perchè le trovo un po' artificiose. La terza ragione potrebbe essere una scelta non ideale del punto di messa a fuoco, anche se mi sembra strano che uno dei reali motivi possa essere questo. In genere controllo sempre azionando il tasto di anteprima della profondità di campo che tutto il frame sia a fuoco. Inoltre la parte centrale del promontorio è sensibilmente più nitida della parte laterale. Magari a casa controllerò il file originale! Ciao, Diego.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
