What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 22, 2011 (14:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The photo is blurry, shutter speed? La foto è poco nitida, tempi di scatto? |
| sent on October 22, 2011 (16:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I agree with esa add that if it was taken more laterally would come a great shot :) Concordo con esa,aggiungo che se fosse stata ripresa più lateralmente sarebbe venuto un ottimo scatto :) |
| sent on October 22, 2011 (19:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Central composition and subject faint ...
Shooting data?
Hello
Fabio Composizione centrale e soggetto poco nitido...
Dati di scatto?
Ciao
Fabio |
user5222 | sent on October 22, 2011 (20:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I would not even say I "shooting data?" but it is always put them to good use in order to have a better chance to make more constructive criticism. Photo, apart from the sharpness, I do not like the background with the pole (?) Heaven which is known and diverts. Non vorrei anche io dire "dati di scatto?" ma è sempre buon uso inserirli, così da avere una maggiore possibilità di fare delle critiche più costruttive. Della foto, a parte la nitidezza, non mi piace lo sfondo con quel palo (?) celeste che si noto e distoglie. |
| sent on October 22, 2011 (20:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
You are right, sorry if I did not set the shutter speed but I had to run away and I have not had time, as soon as they indicaro for all other pictures.
However, the data are as follows:
Canon EOS 50D - EF 100-400 IS L Series to 400 Focal - F 5.6 - T 1/80 handheld.
I state that among other things was the first time I used the 100-400 and I still had to take "measures".
Thanks for the advice Avete ragione, scusate se non ho indicato i tempi di scatto ma dovevo scappare e non ho fatto in tempo, al più presto li indicaro per tutte le altre foto.
Comunque i dati sono i seguenti:
Canon Eos 50D - 100-400 EF IS Serie L a 400 di focale - F 5,6 - T 1/80 a mano libera.
Premetto che tra l'altro era la prima volta che usavo il 100-400 e dovevo ancora prendere le "misure".
Grazie per i consigli |
| sent on October 22, 2011 (21:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice the colors and the point mdi recovery.
The photo does not convince me for these reasons:
- Micromossa due to the long time tripping
- Pole intrusive background
- Not very clear and detailed due shake
A free hand to 400m on aps-c and calculating that the stabilizer of the 100-400mm has only 2 safety stop was preferable to set the aperture priority program in F.8 and raise the ISO enough to reach safety 1/500sec.
The diframma f.5, 6 sfruttalo for portraits or emphases of the focal blur and from 300 up without delay F.8 if you want to opt for maximum sharpness. hello and good light, laurel Piacevoli le cromie e il punto mdi ripresa.
La foto non mi convince per questi motivi:
- micromossa a causa del tempo lungo di scatto
- palo invadente sullo sfondo
- poco nitida e dettagliata causa micromosso
A mano libera a 400m su aps-c e calcolando che lo stabilizzatore del 100-400mm ha solo 2 stop di sicurezza era preferibile impostare il programma priorità di diaframma a f.8 e alzare gli iso quanto bastava per raggiungere 1/500sec di sicurezza.
Il diframma f.5,6 sfruttalo per i ritratti o enfatizzazioni dello sfocato e a focali da 300 in su senza indugiare opta per f.8 se vuoi la massima nitidezza. ciao e buona luce, lauro |
| sent on October 22, 2011 (21:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
to 1/80 freehand was almost impossible it very sharp ...
however, it is very unfortunate that shot ... that thing behind white and blue is not very nice to be seen .. a 1/80 a mano libera era un'impresa quasi impossibile averla molto sharp...
comunque peccato che sia molto girato... quel coso dietro bianco e blu non è molto bello da vedersi.. |
| sent on October 23, 2011 (16:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The subject is taken from behind and lacks clarity .........
Too bad because the puffin is always fascinating. Il soggetto è ripreso da dietro e manca di nitidezza.........
Peccato perchè il puffin è sempre affascinante. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
