JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
user28555
sent on July 26, 2013 (21:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A "tele" so 'pushed not think it's ideal for making macros. The subject and framing are good but the detail and sharpness are penalized too and deserve a dedicated lens, if you like macro photography and 'a choice that you will need to consider (rather obviously those with 1:1 magnification ratio and better yet if stabilized, in this case, however, 'the cost rises).
Hello, Claudio 8-) Un "tele" cosi' spinto non credo sia l'ideale per fare macro. Il soggetto e l'inquadratura sono buoni ma il dettaglio e la nitidezza sono troppo penalizzati e meriterebbero un obiettivo dedicato, se ti piace la fotografia macro e' una scelta che dovrai necessariamente considerare (meglio ovviamente quelli con rapporto di ingrandimento 1:1 e meglio ancora se stabilizzato, in questo caso pero' il costo lievita).
sent on July 27, 2013 (22:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello photos were occasional night I went out to try the 50/500 and I like to try it even in close-ups. In fact I'm taking a tamron 90 but I have to say that the result cm ² surprised me. The Bigma has a very af performance. Dear to pass ... I always write me improve so much! Ciao night le foto sono state occasionali ero uscito per provare il 50/500 e mi è piaciuto provarlo anche nelle ravvicinate. In effetti sto prendendo un tamron 90 ma ti devo dire che il risultato cmq mi ha sorpreso. Il bigma ha un af molto performante. Gentile per il passaggio...scrivetemi sempre devo migliorare tanto!!
sent on August 01, 2013 (20:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Tried super and super telephoto zoom for close-up and in spite of the weight can cause us to take home great shots. Here the maf is inaccurate and the subject-perch have moved. To improve the end result could: -Apply the correct technique for your shake-counter (see my guide) -Ports perfectly parallel to the dragonfly (ground-sensor = subject-roost) -Raise the ISO to 500 -Wait for the dead of the breeze Not under-take at the minimum shooting distance Hello and good light with little wind, laurel Provati super zoom e super tele per close-up e nonostante il peso possono farci portare a casa scatti interessanti. Qui la maf è imprecisa e il soggetto-posatoio sono mossi . Per migliorare il risultato finale potevi: -applicare la corretta tecnica per contrastare il tuo micromosso (vedi mia guida) -porti perfettamente parallelo alla libellula (piano-sensore = soggetto-posatoio) -alzare gli iso a 500 -attendere il punto morto della brezza -non riprendere sotto alla minima distanza di ripresa Ciao e buona luce con poco vento, lauro
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
3.2 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
