What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on July 30, 2013 (17:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hmmm ...
I think the inquadratutra is necessarily broad.
probably by dropping the beach in the lower left corner would have achieved a better balance.
I do not know if it's my monotor then, but it seems overexposed. granparte the sky is burning, and I think there is a blue ...
Question as well what you want.
hello
Daniele Hmmm...
a mio avviso l'inquadratutra è forzatamente ampia.
probabilmente facendo cadere la spiaggia in angolo in basso a sinistra si sarebbe raggiunto un maggiore equilibrio.
Non so se sia il mio monotor poi, ma mi pare sovraesposta. granparte del cielo è bruciata, e mi pare ci sia una dominante blu...
Domanda pure quel che vuoi.
ciao
Daniele |
| sent on July 30, 2013 (18:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello, in the meantime thank you very much for the comments.
Childbirth by'' framing, as is desired. I know it is very exaggerated, and I agree that it would have been more balanced composed in another way, but the series of shots that I did this is what I liked the most, I do not know why, but put next to each other this is what struck me than the others.
The photo unfortunately the sky overexposed. In recover shadows and highlights I adjusted so as not to burn anything "technically" I was a hair under 255 for the white, but unfortunately the sky was already very clear, particularly in the upper right corner.
I had to take a double exposure, I did not because I had the polarizer on and thought it was aboutfficient to compensate for the sky. I noticed it only to return!
Thanks for the comments
William
Ciao, intanto grazie mille per i commenti.
Parto dall''inquadratura, dato che è voluta. So che è molto esasperata, e concordo sul fatto che sarebbe stata più equilibrata composta in altro modo, ma della serie di scatti che ho fatto questo è quello che mi piaceva di più, non so il perchè, ma messi uno accanto all'altro questo è quello che mi ha colpito rispetto agli altri.
La foto purtroppo ha il cielo sovraesposto. Nel recuperare ombre e alte luci ho regolato in modo da non bruciare nulla "tecnicamente": sono stato un pelo sotto i 255 per il bianco, ma il cielo purtroppo era già molto chiaro, in particolare nella parte in alto a destra.
Avrei dovuto scattare con una doppia esposizione, non l'ho fatto perchè avevo il polarizzatore su e pensavo fosse sufficiente a compensare il cielo. Me ne sono accorto solo al ritorno!
Grazie per le osservazioni
Guglielmo
|
| sent on October 09, 2013 (10:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Wow ... Very nice!
Hello ;-) Wow...Bellissima!!!
Ciao |
| sent on October 28, 2013 (19:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Luke ... very pleased to receive praise from people with your talent ... Grazie Luca... fa molto piacere ricevere apprezzamenti da persone con il tuo talento... |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
1.7 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
