JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on October 13, 2013 (20:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Alex, know that they are absolutely not an expert ... well I have just started the adventure. What I notice is that the photo is overexposed and you used a large aperture. Closing it at least f11'd have the chance to keep a shutter speed even lower improving the "silk effect" of water ... always been what your intent. Even a filter nd (neutral) can help for this type of photography ... but do not make my mistake that I took a filter from 20 € only to realize its poor quality. Remember that stopping down get shallow depth of field that allows you to keep in focus the whole combo. Ciao Alex, sappi che non sono assolutamente un esperto... pure io ho iniziato da poco l'avventura. Quello che noto è che la foto è sovraesposta ed hai utilizzato un diaframma molto aperto. Chiudendolo almeno a f11 avresti avuto la possibilità tenere un tempo di scatto ancora più basso migliorando "l'effetto seta" dell'acqua... sempre sia stato quello il tuo intento. Anche un filtro nd (neutro) può aiutarti per questo tipo di fotografia... ma non fare il mio errore che ho preso un filtro da 20 euro per poi accorgermi della sua pessima qualità. Ricordati che chiudendo il diaframma ottieni profondità di campo che permette di mantenere a fuoco tutta la combo.
sent on October 13, 2013 (21:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
You're right, and overexposed but I was just at the beginning and before you take the picture I thought about it a little ... just errors that you realize just doing many foto.l 'intent obviously was to make water ... but with combed poor result is .... well .. thanks for the advice of filters. Now with the new goal I hope to play around a bit more Hai ragione e sovraesposta ma ero proprio all'inizio e prima di fare la foto ci ho pensato un pò...soli che degli errori ti accorgi solo facendo tante foto.l'intento ovviamente era fare l'acqua pettinata...ma con scarso risultato....va be..grazie per i consiglio dei filtri. Adesso con l'obbiettivo nuovo spero di sbizzarrirmi un po di più
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
16.1 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
