What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on July 18, 2013 (14:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
But how do you take these pictures?? Ma come fate a fare queste foto??? |
| sent on July 18, 2013 (15:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The moment is really good, but if sfocavi the bottom would be the photo of the year (which I would try to make pp). 8-) L'attimo è veramente ottimo,però se sfocavi il fondo sarebbe stata la foto dell'anno(cosa che proverei a fare in pp). |
| sent on July 18, 2013 (15:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
missing data from shooting I would like to know how do you get everything in focus subject mountains houses etc etc also do not seem real PROPRORZIONI thanks for the reply mancano i dati di scatto vorrei sapere come si fa ad avere tutto a fuoco soggetto montagne case ecc ecc anche le proprorzioni non sembrano reali grazie per la risposta |
| sent on July 18, 2013 (19:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
As Maurizio ... Come Maurizio... |
| sent on July 18, 2013 (20:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Surely wide-angle and remote shutter release Sicuramente grandangolo e scatto remoto |
| sent on July 18, 2013 (20:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I've seen shots of the genre, with both subject and subject in focus, and I have done several times the same question by Maurizio ... in principle, assuming that the author is not a phenomenon of photomontages, but more capable than the average in photography ... my biggest curiosity is how did you know I came right there?? ho già visto scatti del genere, con soggetto e soggetti entrambi a fuoco, e mi sono fatto più volte la stessa domanda di Maurizio... per principio parto dal presupposto che l'autore non sia un fenomeno dei fotomontaggi, ma capace più della media in fotografia... la mia curiosità più grande è come facevi a sapere che arrivava proprio lì??? |
| sent on July 18, 2013 (21:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Guys, I have a similar photo anke and if done at wide aperture cn a bit 'closed you have almost everything in focus ... Anyway I congratulate you cn x the beautiful image! Hello David! Ciao Ragazzi,anke io ho una foto simile e se fatta con grandangolo cn diaframma un po' chiuso si ha quasi tutto a fuoco...cmq mi complimenti cn te x la bella immagine!! Ciao Davide! |
| sent on July 18, 2013 (21:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Brenta Group, crops of apples from Val di Non, and buzzard chick from the nest of thrush looted, nothing is missing. Too bad that when they replaced the old plants now the Raptor has lost the usual roost. How do I know? I could not participate in the shooting but the sigma 12-24 (on APSC) was mine. Hello Michele PS I think that the background is intentionally out of focus. For those who see the picture and does not know the place can be one wallpapers "intrusive" but for someone who lives there is zonz in his house, even our ... Gruppo del Brenta,coltivazioni di mele della Val di Non, poiana e nidiaceo di tordo predato dal nido; non manca nulla. Peccato che quando hanno sostituito quelle piante ormai vecchie il rapace abbia perso quel posatoio abituale. Come faccio a saperlo? Non ho potuto partecipare allo scatto ma il sigma 12-24 ( su apsc) era il mio. Ciao Michele P.S. Credo che lo sfondo sia volutamente a fuoco. Per chi vede la foto e non conosce il posto può essere uno sfondi "invadente" ma per chi in zonz ci abita è casa sua, anzi nostra... |
| sent on July 18, 2013 (23:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It is not a photomontage, I could see the originals and I was in awe! Congratulations deserved ... what makes the difference here is the knowledge of the subject, x do these shots have to know where you will place the subject, to have much luck set the aperture wide-angle lens with a fairly closed and you will have your subject and everything else fire ah ... of course the cable remote! Non è un fotomontaggio, ho potuto vedere gli originali e sono rimasto a bocca aperta!!! Complimenti meritatissimi...ciò che fà la differenza qui è la conoscenza del soggetto, x fare questi scatti bisogna sapere dove si poserà il soggetto, avere molta fortuna impostare il grandangolo con un diaframma abbastanza chiuso e si avrà il soggetto e tutto il resto a fuoco...ah naturalmente il cavetto a distanza!!! |
| sent on July 19, 2013 (9:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
excellent recovery, I know very well the landscape behind and buzzards there are several, the problem is to photograph! ottima ripresa, conosco molto bene il paesaggio dietro e di poiane c'e ne sono parecchie, il problema è fotografarle! |
| sent on July 19, 2013 (16:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
This picture has absolutely nothing wrong with that. As they said Michele and Jacopo (J.Rigo) who have preceded me if you have a great knowledge of the subject and are able to anticipate the moves they make these shots with the wide angle, then the effect like it or not that is a ' another matter. Not knowing the precise method used by Mauro, I would have said that he had used a sensor. Congratulations on the result, the background behind to be honest I do not really like, I would have preferred more wild, but everything else is great. Accomplishments. Hello, Ivan Questa foto non ha assolutamente niente di strano. Come hanno detto Michele e Jacopo (J.Rigo) che mi hanno preceduto se hai una gran conoscenza del soggetto e riesci ad anticiparne le mosse questi scatti li fai con il grand'angolo, poi che l'effetto piaccia o no quello è un'altro discorso. Non sapendo il metodo preciso usato da Mauro, avrei detto che avesse usato un sensore. Complimenti per il risultato, lo sfondo dietro devo essere sincero non mi piace molto, lo avrei preferito più wild, ma tutto il resto è fantastico. Compimenti. Ciao, Ivan |
| sent on July 31, 2013 (6:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great shot on the fly, nice, and very dynamic hello Ottimo scatto al volo, bello, e molto dinamico ciao |
| sent on July 31, 2013 (6:31)
Yes, a very interesting and fascinating shot no matter how it was accomplished. Well done. Wally |
| sent on July 31, 2013 (7:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
a nice mix between landscape and nature, good and different the picture! un bel mix tra paesaggio e natura, ottima e diversa la foto! |
| sent on July 31, 2013 (9:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very well done hello Luca Molto ben fatta ciao Luca |
| sent on July 31, 2013 (11:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great shoot, great.
“ missing data from shooting „ Grande scatto, bravissimo. " mancano i dati di scatto" |
| sent on July 31, 2013 (16:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Photo exceptional, for me the background is too "urban" as they have already written, but not detract from the skill of the photographer. Rather the lens has a problem because it's pretty obvious on the left and on the right is in focus is strongly out of focus. Foto eccezionale, per me lo sfondo è troppo "urbano" come hanno già scritto, ma nulla toglie alla bravura del fotografo. Piuttosto l'ottica ha un problema abbastanza evidente perchè a sinistra è a fuoco e a dx è fortemente fuori fuoco. |
| sent on July 31, 2013 (17:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ on the left and on the right is in focus is strongly out of focus. „
It seems to me the opposite, looking at the picture. " a sinistra è a fuoco e a dx è fortemente fuori fuoco. " A me sembra il contrario, guardando la foto. |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |