Café in Mantua | JuzaPhoto

Join JuzaPhoto!

A A ? HELP SEARCH

Galleries
Portrait and Fashion

Resize to fit window

40.5 MEGAPIXEL

Ritratti View gallery (55 photos)

Café in Mantua sent on 23 Gennaio 2026 (0:03) by Juza. 10 comments, 3009 views.

, 1/200 f/1.2, ISO 3200, hand held.

View High Resolution 40.5 MP Buy Usage License

84 persons like it: 66tonycar, 7h3 L4w, Alberto Tirri, Alessio Giuliani, Alphaman, Amirkhani, Antonia Cam, aPagliari, Arx, Baribal, Bo Larkeed, BokehBeauty, Bruno_pratico, Carlo Bassi, Claudio Cozzani, Claudio Ricci, Claudio Sciarra, Daniele_Conte, Diodato Campagna, Elisabetta Leonardi, Emilio Salaris, Fab0569, Fbr, Fescar, Fiodor, Franck.Sigma, Fulvio Gioria, Gazebo, Giancarlo Vetrone, Gianni Fazer, Gianni Golinelli, Gios, Giovanni e Davide, Hubert, Ivan Catellani, Jacky71, Jeant, Jerry Vacchieri, Jonathan68, Latino Rosario, LivioCra, Lorenzo Crovetto, Loribert, Luigi Torino, M.ghise, Marco Neri, Marco434, Marco50, Mario Vigo, Maryas, Massimo_70, Matley Siena, Mattbo, Maxmontella, Mimmo Aquino, Mnardell, Momiziano, Moro, Nonno Baker, Nordend4612, PadreFerel, Panleo1, Paolovalzelli, Peppe Cancellieri, Photo Infinity, Pm544, Renni, Riccardo Bruno, Riccardo Panzeri, Roberto Dani, Roberto Degli Uomini, Roberto Miniero, Robybinfa, Robycass, Roy72chi, Sandro Peddis, Simoneperi1967, Star Trek, Stefania Saffioti, StefanoFerioli, TheBlackbird, Tobé, Tsunamihaz, Zamax

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 258000members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Momiziano

sent on 23 Gennaio 2026 (9:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Beautiful. In addition to the photographer, the lens is even lighter and even more performing, the sigmas are more and more objects of "premium" desire. You preferred 3200 ISO and 1/200 of a second. Excuse the curiosity but set in manual or with auto ISO on the time (I don't know if the question is legitimate..)?

Juza	sent on 23 Gennaio 2026 (9:34) \| This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original) Thank you! :-) I shot in aperture priority and with ISO in manual, I always prefer to have control over the sensitivity.

Maxmontella

sent on 23 Gennaio 2026 (9:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Kill this 1.2 the depth of field knocks it down, if you miss the fire you're! :-D

Undertaker

sent on 23 Gennaio 2026 (10:55)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Non ho i titoli e le competenze per esprimere un giudizio sulla qualità della foto. Però posso dire che questo "estremo" stacco dato dall'1.2 non rientra nelle mie corde. Immagino sia una cosa voluta per mostrare le potenzialità della lente, ma il ritratto frontale con un occhio a fuoco ed uno no, non rientra decisamente nei miei gusti.
Personalmente apprezzo più l'altra foto in galleria con la modella di profilo dove in effetti hai un occhio a fuoco ma l'altro "non c'è" perchè dall'altra parte del video.

Diciamo che lo vedo molto come un bellissimo esempio di cosa possa fare un 1.2, nel bene e nel male!

Fcl	sent on 23 Gennaio 2026 (12:54) \| This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original) Arms and body are a boulder without details

Nonno Baker

sent on 23 Gennaio 2026 (14:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Quality optics that offer endless possibilities. Extreme CT clearly must be able to manage.

Thinner5

sent on 23 Gennaio 2026 (16:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The dimensions are much smaller than the previous version; does the IQ seem to you to be ate?

Juza

sent on 24 Gennaio 2026 (8:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thank you all for the comments!

“ The dimensions are much smaller than the previous version; does the IQ seem to you to be ate? „

Yes, it's razor-sharp already wide open and has really nice bokeh!

“ Arms and body are a boulder without details „

On my screen (OLED and well calibrated) there is still a good cut, then yes, maybe I could lighten that part slightly to increase the cut, even if I wouldn't call it "without details" ;-)

Nicola De Crecchio

sent on 24 Gennaio 2026 (10:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

In this shot it seems to me that there is that kind of ball of yarn (Christmas lights?) on the left that for me penalizes the image as a whole.

Zacpifoto

sent on 28 Gennaio 2026 (16:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I like the scenery, or rather the atmosphere of the photo, but in my opinion the lens seems to me to lack definition, the texture of the hair and especially the eyes I don't see well defined, the final effect is a bit "flou".

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.