JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on October 18, 2011 (0:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
the background is a bit 'noisy and maybe some white a bit' on the edge, I guess freehand, with the iso already stretched, with the subject in business ... I do not know if you could do more ... ;-) lo sfondo è un po' rumoroso e forse c'è qualche bianco un po' al limite; immagino a mano libera, con gli iso già tirati, con soggetto in attività... non so se si poteva far di più...
sent on October 18, 2011 (14:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
good attempt
perhaps there is still room for improvement in some parameters pp
for example, but only for example would try
a) to dim the lights to recover a little on the white b) would try with the option shadows / lights to retrieve details on the lower part of the subject c) maybe I would try to write a puree with the unsharp mask d) if one were to resubmit background noise a slight passed with a program for the correction of the noise
Take these my ramblings of course only as an example and nothing else
hello buono il tentativo
forse c'e ancora spazio per migliorare qualche parametro in pp
per esempio,ma solo per esempio proverei
a)ad abbassare le luci per recuperare un poco sul bianco b)proverei con l'opzione ombre/luci per recuperare dettagli sulla parte bassa del soggetto c)proverei magari a dare una passatina con la maschera di contrasto d)se si dovesse ripresentare rumore di fondo una leggera passata con un programma per la correzione del rumore
prendi questi miei vaneggiamenti ovviamente solo come esempio e nulla altro
sent on October 18, 2011 (18:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Infas gave you some good straight forward, the butterfly is truly well composed in the frame lacking only the optimal management of light.
HELLO Infas ti ha dato delle ottime dritte da seguire, la farfallina sinceramente è ben composta nel fotogramma manca solo la gestione ottimale della luce.
sent on October 18, 2011 (19:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you all for your comments and advice :)
@ Infas: photoshop how to apply the first point? I have to do it in camera raw? For the sharpening settings that you use? I applied the color noise reduction, then an unsharp mask intensity 20 and 10 px radius and then again lighter color noise reduction noise reduction of luminance ... some other method / settings to do?
@ Maximum Menzaghi: right, moving subject and ISO 800 (in 1600 the 450D is not utilizzabilissima)
@ Maxspin: It was about 16, and in fact the whites are a bit 'overexposed :) Grazie a tutti per i commenti ed i consigli :)
@Infas: con photoshop come applico il primo punto? Devo farlo in camera raw? Per la maschera di contrasto tu che impostazioni usi? Io ho applicato la riduzione del rumore cromatico, poi una maschera di contrasto intensità 20 e raggio 10 px e poi ancora riduzione rumore cromatico più leggera riduzione del rumore della luminanza...qualche altro metodo/impostazioni per procedere?
@ Massimo Menzaghi: esatto, soggetto in movimento e 800 iso (a 1600 la 450D non è utilizzabilissima)
@Maxspin: Erano le 16 circa ed in effetti i bianchi sono un po' sovraesposti :)
sent on October 18, 2011 (19:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
PS: the tiff file that I saved on the PC has a little 'less noise and colors a bit' less saturated ... is the conversion to jpeg that has these effects? P.S.: il file tiff che ho salvato su pc ha un po' meno rumore e colori un po' meno saturi...è la conversione in jpeg che ha questi effetti?
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
