What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 256000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 13, 2025 (23:54) | This comment has been translated
Spectacular! |
| sent on November 13, 2025 (23:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Remarkable work. Opera notevole. |
| sent on November 14, 2025 (19:01) | This comment has been translated
Fabulous |
| sent on November 17, 2025 (10:07) | This comment has been translated
Thank you! |
| sent on November 19, 2025 (9:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful shot, if I really have to find something to my personal taste maybe I find the stars a bit intrusive, otherwise excellent, you have collected a lot of signal even around the nebula. Congratulations! Bellissima ripresa, se devo proprio trovare qualcosa a mio gusto personale forse trovo le stelle un po invadenti, per il resto ottima, hai raccolto davvero tanto segnale anche intorno alla nebulosa. Complimenti! |
| sent on November 19, 2025 (14:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you Gianluca, confirm the impression I had, in the elaboration phase this time I struggled to reduce the stars.
Paradoxically, the sky was quite clear, and I reached a very low fwhm, like never before.
What has changed, compared to the previous shots, is the sensor, I went from 183 to 585.
So, just to get an opinion, how does this look to you?: www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=5135940&l=it Ti ringrazio Gianluca, mi confermi l'impressione che ho avuto, in fase di elaborazione stavolta ho faticato a ridurre le stelle.
Il cielo paradossalmente era piuttosto terso, e ho raggiunto un fwhm molto basso, come mai prima.
A cambiare, rispetto alle precedenti riprese è il sensore, sono passato dalla 183 alla 585.
Così, giusto per avere un parere (fatta con lo stesso sensore), come ti sembra invece questa?: www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=5135940&l=it |
| sent on November 19, 2025 (15:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I find them less intrusive than this one, even if they are always very 'strong' in the image, very bright. It probably also depends a lot on the average magnitude of the stars in the field.
During the processing phase, do you manage stars and the sky background separately or do you go to process them together? Le trovo meno invadenti rispetto a questa, anche se sempre molto 'forti' nell'immagine, molto luminose. Probabilmente dipende molto anche dalla magnitudine media delle stelle presenti nel campo.
In fase di elaborazione gestisci separatamente stelle e fondo cielo o vai ad elaborarle insieme? |
| sent on November 19, 2025 (16:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I generally separate just to manage saturation selectively.
I think at this point it also depends on the different sensor. Generalmente separo giusto per gestire la saturazione in modo selettivo.
Credo che a questo punto dipenda anche dal sensore diverso. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
6.2 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
