Examination of macro

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Macro and Flora

Resize to fit window

Farfalle View gallery (8 photos)

Examination of macro sent on July 09, 2013 (21:23) by Diego.armando.parafango. 36 comments, 4501 views.

, 1/200 f/7.1, ISO 100, hand held. Specie: Melanargia galathea

Questo scatto è praticamente il primo macro un pò studiato ,quindi commenti e critiche son ben accettate a fine di migliorare poichè è un genere che mi interessa abbastanza :-) #Wild #FuocoSelettivo #SelectiveFocus

78 persons like it: Afrikachiara, Alago, Alberto Perer, Albertopantellini, Albieri Sergio, Andesigno, Andy69, Annamaria Pertosa, Antonioceriani, Antonioronchini, Aringhe Blu, Atzeni Bruno, Basioli.l, Batt, Beatricecapone, Bo Larkeed, Brunetto, Carlo Bassi, Cavernicolo, Ciocca Sergio, Diamante_P, Diego49, Dinocelle, Donna, Emozionevisiva, Enrico43, Enricocat, Ettore Grosso, Finco, Flammeus, Francesco Abbate, Franco Caracalli, Franco Vianello, Fulviagori, Gabriele Castellari, Gaetano De Rosa, Gazebo, Gian Antonio, Gianfranco Fontana, Giovanni Magli, Inge, Ivancosta, Jeant, Jody85, Koda59, Larissa71, Lazzamax, Leon e Sara, Marco Bertolini, Marcofarina, Massimo Pellizon, Matanò Francesco, Michela Checchetto, Michele Marini, Missbrombillo, Monica Pelizzetti, Nadir Francesco Capoccia, Nerone, Oceanoprofondo7, OpenSpaces, Osvaldomorelli, Paolo Corona, Pawel68, Pedrorusch, Raffaele Della Santa, Roberto F, Roberto Ravecca, Romeopiera, Sandro Mosca, Sandros49, Simona Loredana, Simonciniandrea, Simone93, Slawek, Specchio81, Stefano Marangoni, Va.mark, Zman

PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 241000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Oceanoprofondo7

sent on July 09, 2013 (21:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Excellent

Diego.armando.parafango

sent on July 09, 2013 (22:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thank you very much! :-D

Ivancosta

sent on July 09, 2013 (23:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I like it, you've been shopping?? :-D

Diego.armando.parafango

sent on July 10, 2013 (7:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Ivan, that expense? :-D

Franco Vianello

sent on July 10, 2013 (10:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Armando, to be the first macro is a good start.
Personally I see the subject is not in focus / sharp.
Background noise is perhaps due to crop a little accentuated, since the iso low.
Greetings Franco 8-)

Ivancosta

sent on July 10, 2013 (10:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

70 200 f2.8 L USM 8-) seems to me a great expense

Diego.armando.parafango

sent on July 10, 2013 (11:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Ivan, no and already a bit 'that is the I, I took also used this ....... That remains cm ² also used a nice blow wow! Wow!, But it is a great lens

user612

sent on July 10, 2013 (12:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

If I can be frank bun would be a snap, with the maf in the eye and without all the noise that is seen conspicuously. Although it is a big lens, and certainly not by macros. Hello and good light.
Giorgio

Michela Checchetto

sent on July 10, 2013 (13:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Diego!
Quoto observations Franco (and George .... he wanted to be f (F) rancowow!:-D) and the fact that

“ to be the first macro is a good start „

.
Without the right goal, however, is difficult to obtain better results and therefore I wish to invest early in a macro because the compositional skills do not miss it at all! ;-)
Salutoniiiii! :-P
Michela

Ivancosta

sent on July 10, 2013 (15:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

George and Michael are right! buy a nice macro is to become number ONE in this discipline as well ;-)

Diego.armando.parafango

sent on July 10, 2013 (16:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thank you very much to Franco, George, Michael and Ivan (too good!), You also I noticed right away that the noise but I think it's due to the crop as I took in 100iso, the maf is pretty central in fact the "wing in the sup is a little less focus ......... thank you! good day

.......... A good macro lens?

Michela Checchetto

sent on July 10, 2013 (23:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

IMHO, of Canon, go to the 100 macro (not the stabilized .... money spent for nothing). :-P ;-)
Before switching to Nikon, Canon mounted them on that, and I really enjoyed it!
Go here and find info on Juza and Reviews (mine too!)

[URL =] www.juzaphoto.com/recensione.php?l=it&t=canon_100_macro

or you can also take the Tamron 90 for Canon. Excellent value for money! I am using it and it gives me a lot of satisfaction!

[URL =] www.juzaphoto.com/recensione.php?l=it&t=tamron_90macro

Bye-bye! :-P
Michela

Oceanoprofondo7

sent on July 11, 2013 (4:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I agree with michela, 100 normal macro is really good, I have the 100L is, but because of me, I still have not pulled out anything good ... you are!
I think the Tamron is good too, if I remember correctly, Juza spoke well, if you can, try them both to see

Diego.armando.parafango

sent on July 11, 2013 (7:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Many thanks to both of you! Today I look calmly everything well ciaooooo

Simona Loredana

sent on July 12, 2013 (20:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Your really beautiful butterfly:-P, congratulations!
Have a great weekend, a greeting:-P

Koda59

sent on July 12, 2013 (22:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Congratulations Diego for your photo to be your first macro I would say that the result is appreciable and that's why I say bravo! I have to be honest, I was waiting for some of your photos and all I could expect from you except the macro, obviously you have been infected mainly by Michela in kind "floral" gets along very well and also by Simona who started the macro very well . I, although my photos of flowers are not too bad, I must work a little 'more about this photographic genre that requires a lot of technical expertise together with a great patience. The photos I took, fortuitously, to the butterfly while I was gone for bird-watching is totally random, I made an occasional goal: a 70-300 which is certainly not a goal dedicated to the macro, but I had the eos 60d and, fortunately by the sensor and the "crop factor" has allowed me to take home una "macro". Diego, I am convinced that you, good and imaginative as you are, you can succeed very well in every photographic genre and with a little 'perseverance and application can achieve good results and convincing even in the macro. Recently I bought the 100 macro 2.8 IS lens that is stabilized, that if we just do macro and use the tripod is quite right our dear Michelle: you do not need the IS version, but if we do portraits in difficult lighting conditions then is another story, you know I try to span various genres, but the portrait is among those who prefer a stabilized lens and the picture is very, very useful, especially when the lighting conditions are critical. So my advice is to choose the lens according to those who are your favorite types of photography. :-P ;-) I take this opportunity to augurarand to you and to all the people of this discussion a good night and a good weekend ;-)

user22061

sent on July 13, 2013 (1:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I took a macro and has twenty days quarrel with the depth of field because I do not ever leave everything in focus. It is a world apart, it is a marvel. I wish you good light and profiqua. A greeting.

Diego.armando.parafango

sent on July 13, 2013 (11:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thank you very much Koda, always very helpful and thanks good advice on the objectives, thanks to Paolo good weekend to all and thanks again

Pigi47

sent on July 16, 2013 (17:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

There is no doubt to be your first picture of the kind I'd say you defended, but the free hand often does not pay, because the detail is not sharp as they say.
Rivedrei in RAW white balance and color temperature ritoccherei immediately after heating it soon.
For noise you've already said it.

Simone93

sent on July 22, 2013 (11:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Not bad for being the first :-) Thank you :-)

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.