JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Comet C/2025 R2 SWAN sent on October 25, 2025 (17:38) by Giovanni Soligo. 11 comments, 117 views. tripod.
Ho ripreso la cometa dal balcone di casa a Formia (LT) utilizzando un piccolo rifrattore Tecnosky 60Ed focale 360mm con filtro SV260 e camera ASI533MC Pro su montatura equatoriale EQ3.2 OnStep. Autoguida con 40/170mm + camera ASI224MC. Il tutto gestito da ASIAIR Pro.
Sono 16 scatti da 60s - gain 101
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 255000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on October 25, 2025 (21:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Probably the union (Photoshop) of the comet with the trails of the moved stars (Siril) and the fixed stars (obtained through the DeepSkyStacker stack). The whole Siril process for the comet's stack is not giving an acceptable result. I'll try the trial version of Pixinsight Probabilmente l'unione (Photoshop) della cometa con le scie delle stelle mosse (Siril) e le stelle fisse (ottenute tramite stack di DeepSkyStacker). Il processo intero di Siril per lo stack della cometa è stelle non da un risultato accettabile. Proverò con la versione trial di Pixinsight
sent on October 25, 2025 (21:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Those have nothing to do (I think eh!) with that pattern. I think then it's something related to the various stacks and then put back together. I made a tutorial with 3 methods for pix, if you feel like trying the first one. For the starless version I recommend adding Starnet+ to pixinsight, it's free. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VrdCcL8J8x8 The R2 Swan is less exciting than the other! Quelli non c'entrano niente (penso eh !) con quel pattern. Penso allora che sia qualcosa relativo ai vari stack e poi rimessi insieme. Io feci un tutorial con 3 metodi per pix, se hai voglia prova il primo. Per le versione starless ti consiglio di aggiungere a pixinsight Starnet+, è free.
La R2 Swan comunque rispetto all'altra è meno emozionante !
sent on October 26, 2025 (19:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
But isn't it better not to use dithering for comets? otherwise the alignment is busted, right? Ma non è meglio non utilizzarlo il dithering per le comete? altrimenti si sballa l'allineamento, no?
sent on October 27, 2025 (7:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Zeppo absolutely must be used, as if it were a normal object. Because anyway after you make two alignments, one for the stars and one for the comet, using its nucleus. What is really imperative is not to exaggerate with the length of the poses because otherwise the core is lengthened already in the single shot. Assolutamente va usato Zeppo, come fosse un oggetto normale. Perché comunque dopo fai due allineamenti, uno per le stelle e uno per la cometa, usando il suo nucleo. Quello che davvero è diciamo imperativo è non esagerare con la lunghezza delle pose perché altrimenti il nucleo viene allungato già nel singolo scatto.