What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 255000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 18, 2025 (9:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Having seen and photographed it is no small thing. Congratulations. Hello. Magú Averla vista e fotografata non è poco. Complimenti. Ciao. Magú |
| sent on October 18, 2025 (11:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
very nice congratulations, but 60 seconds without astrotracker only tripod ? molto bella complimenti , ma 60 secondi senza astroinseguitore solo cavalletto ? |
| sent on October 18, 2025 (12:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ but 60 seconds without astrotracker only tripod ? „
impossible. There is something that doesn't add up
Moreover, even 60 seconds at 600 mm on the astrotracker are quite a lot, unless you also have autoguider
" ma 60 secondi senza astroinseguitore solo cavalletto ?"
Impossibile. C'è qualcosa che non torna
Peraltro, anche 60 secondi a 600 mm su astroinseguitore sono parecchi, a meno di non avere anche l'autoguida
|
| sent on October 18, 2025 (13:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you for the visit
I used the star adventurer as a star tracker and the seconds are 83, there is something blurred but it is not intrusive, tonight I will try again, I would like to take more shots and add them up, but I have difficulty finding it, I have to take several shots until I find it and then I center it better but I definitely lose half an hour
Hello Grazie per la visita
Ho usato lo star adventurer come astroinseguitore ed i secondi sono 83 , qualcosa di mosso c'è ma non è invadente , stasera ci riproverò , vorrei fare più scatti e sommarli , ho però difficoltà a trovarla , devo fare parecchi scatti finchè la trovo e poi la centro meglio ma ci perdo sicuramente mezz'ora
Ciao |
| sent on October 18, 2025 (16:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ however, I have difficulty finding it, I have to take several shots until I find it and then I center it better but I certainly lose half an hour „
Sorry, but if you use the 200-600, which also has an internal zoom, isn't it convenient for you to frame it first at 200 mm, and then switch to 600 mm?
I tell you this because half an hour to frame it correctly is absolutely exaggerated, surely there is some conceptual error you make (or, rather, something you should do, and instead you don't) " ho però difficoltà a trovarla , devo fare parecchi scatti finchè la trovo e poi la centro meglio ma ci perdo sicuramente mezz'ora"
Scusa, ma se usi il 200-600, che ha pure lo zoom interno, non ti è comodo inquadrarla prima a 200 mm, e successivamente passare a 600 mm?
Te lo dico perché mezz'ora per inquadrarla correttamente è assolutamente esagerato, sicuramente c'è qualche errore concettuale che fai (o, meglio, qualcosa che dovresti fare, e invece non fai) |
| sent on October 18, 2025 (16:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In fact that's what I thought, but while I was going home, tonight I'll try again, hello and thank you Infatti e' quello che ho pensato , però mentre tornavo a casa , stasera ci riprovo , ciao e grazie |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
6.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
