RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Portrait and Fashion
  4. » Lights and darkness

 
Lights and darkness...

Ritratti in studio

View gallery (31 photos)

Lights and darkness sent on October 14, 2025 (16:06) by Leonardo Carignani. 16 comments, 640 views. [retina]

at 67mm, 1/50 f/4.0, ISO 500, hand held.




View High Resolution 20.0 MP  



What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 256000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on October 17, 2025 (22:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Something doesn't add up to me...



avatarsenior
sent on October 18, 2025 (10:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

What an eye, chapeau...

avatarsenior
sent on October 18, 2025 (12:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Therefore?

avatarjunior
sent on October 18, 2025 (13:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Come on guys, don't leave me in doubt. What did Leonardo do? :-)

avatarsenior
sent on October 18, 2025 (14:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

But nothing, I jokingly noticed that the female hand so well cared for clashes a bit with the fur of my arm :-D

avatarsenior
sent on October 18, 2025 (15:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

It's the new woke fashion, you have to have shrubs, even under the armpits :-D

avatarsenior
sent on October 18, 2025 (15:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Exactly, I said it yesterday at the Festa :-D

avatarsenior
sent on October 18, 2025 (19:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Eh, gentlemen, you're right, but the poor photographer was a lot annoyed to patch up with Photoshop :-D
In the end it was a commissioned set: how she wanted to look, I portrayed her
Luckily no shrubs under the armpits!
Apart from that, a good model, precise and punctual, who gave me carte blanche on almost everything

avatarjunior
sent on October 19, 2025 (11:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

How much rubbish, and you who are the photographer, instead of defending your work and the model, participate in this ridiculous indignation.
oh the hair, what a horror, it's woke culture.
I would like to know which culture instead led you to be indignant about hair on your arms, or armpits, and maybe even be indignant about wrinkles and poop you defecate.
We question nature.

avatarsenior
sent on October 19, 2025 (13:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Oh, and thank goodness I said I was joking lol
Anyway, for example, I like the natural fool. Hairy arms also not.
But they are tastes, like any other characteristic that is preferred in a man or a woman. if the claim of hair is fashionable.
Indeed, it is precisely fashions that I find ridiculous as a principle.

avatarsenior
sent on October 19, 2025 (15:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

We are under a photo of me, and as such I act as moderator. Let's leave sexual tastes outside, if possible, which does not seem to me the most appropriate context.
Having said that, S0what, what would I have to defend? My work was not criticized, I did not feel attacked by any comment.
Then between indignation and aesthetic preferences we pass, eh. I'm not a child of the 60s, I've never loved long hair, especially not on a photo set, but I wasn't annoyed or scandalized by it, so much so that I didn't, as I said, feel the need to work on it in post. Let's avoid making useless controversy.

avatarjunior
sent on October 19, 2025 (17:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hi Leonardo, by "defend" I meant "to be professional".
I guess the girl paid you for the photoshoot and gave you consent to post the images.
I doubt though that he has also authorized you to share personal details, such as armpit hair or the like.
Rumble, your personal tastes are irrelevant.
And it's not clear if I was joking or really talking after this message: "That's right, I said that yesterday at MrGreen's Party."
And about the issue of "woke culture" which you think would promote fluff.
I wonder, what culture in the 50s first, and then in the 90s, promoted hair removal instead?

avatarsenior
sent on October 19, 2025 (17:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Guys, it's not really the case to make it an issue.
Of course my tastes are irrelevant, it was just to say that I'm certainly not one of those who thinks that if the woman is hairy she is less woman or if shaved she is more so lol. The battles over "genres" do not interest me or concern.
It was a joke linked to a mere personal taste, nothing else.

avatarjunior
sent on October 19, 2025 (17:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Ok, then I apologize. I didn't realize you were joking.

avatarsenior
sent on October 19, 2025 (17:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

No prob 8-)

avatarsenior
sent on October 19, 2025 (18:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

S0what, what personal details would I have disclosed?
Saying, in response to a message, in a joking tone, that she did not have hairy armpits, does not seem to me who knows what violation of privacy, since it can be easily deduced by looking at the other photos in the gallery, nor did I ironize about her femininity. In fact, I praised her because she was a pleasure to work with. Why do we have to see evil in everything?
That said, since you and Rombro have clarified, I would prefer that the next comments, if there ever should be, were limited to the goodness or otherwise of the shot.


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me