What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 255000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 13, 2025 (9:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice well detailed macro
Hello
Bella macro ben dettagliata
Ciao
|
| sent on October 13, 2025 (14:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A noteworthy front end that highlights your freehand rather well. Un frontale degno di nota che mette piuttosto bene in risalto il tuo mano libera. |
| sent on October 14, 2025 (11:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A show, excellent frontal shot, perfect maf on the eyes
Many compliments Uno spettacolo, ottimo scatto frontale, perfetta la maf sugli occhi
Tanti complimenti |
| sent on October 14, 2025 (14:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A very good image, with a very appropriate selective focus and an excellent background.
What doesn't add up to me from a technical point of view is how you achieved this result with a lens that has a minimum focusing distance of 50 cm. and with an F:22 aperture.
... unless you have used additional optics.
Hello.
Un'ottima immagine, con un fuoco selettivo molto appropriato ed uno sfondo eccellente.
Quello che non mi torna da un punto di vista tecnico è come tu abbia ottenuto questo risultato con un'ottica che ha una distanza minima di messa a fuoco di 50 cm. e con un diaframma F:22.
... a meno che tu non abbia utilizzato aggiuntivi ottici.
Ciao.
|
| sent on October 14, 2025 (17:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I didn't quite understand the question, but I guess you're referring to the reproduction ratio, right?
If so, the reproduction ratio is that of the lens, now I don't remember at what distance I photographed it, but at most it reaches 1:1.
Then I crop the images more or less according to what I need to eliminate annoying parts and highlight the subject.
It is clear that the resolution does not change, the details are those obtainable with the magnification of the lens...
Non ho ben capito la domanda, ma immagino ti riferisca al rapporto di riproduzione, giusto?
Se è cosi, il rapporto di riproduzione è quello dell'obiettivo, adesso non ricordo a che distanza l'ho fotografato, ma al massimo si arriva all'1:1.
Poi le immagini le ritaglio più o meno a seconda di quanto mi serve per eliminare parti fastidiose e mettere in evidenza il soggetto.
È chiaro che la risoluzione non cambia, i dettagli sono quelli ottenibili con l'ingrandimento della lente...
|
| sent on October 14, 2025 (22:20) | This comment has been translated
Fantastic! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
19.6 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
