What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 255000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 10, 2025 (21:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
With a good autofocus the maf is there, the parallelism is good enough, the maf is lost at the bottom of the wings. The composition is flawed in my opinion. The flowers on the left disturb and close, removing air in front of the subject, while behind the specimen I find the empty space left by placing the subject in a central position excessive. Maybe a different cut would help
A greeting
Con un buon autofocus la maf c'è, abbastaza bene il parallelismo ,la maf si perde in fondo alle ali. La composizione pecca a mio avviso. I fiori a sx disturbano e chiudono togliendo aria davanti al soggetto, mentre dietro l'esemplare trovo eccessivo lo spazio vuoto lasciato collocando il soggetto in posizione centrale. Forse un taglio diverso aiuterebbe
Un saluto
|
| sent on October 10, 2025 (22:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Claudio, in fact the wing is not perfectly in focus, I took several shots of this butterfly and I liked this one for the fact that the spirotromba was not completely closed.
For the composition, you're right, the flowers in front are not the best, but after all at that moment the camera angle was that, while for the back, being a crop I can make up for it!
Thank you Grazie Claudio, in effetti l'ala non è perfettamente a fuoco, ho fatto diversi scatti di questa farfalla e questo mi piaceva per il fatto che la spirotromba non era del tutto chiusa.
Per la composizione, hai ragione, i fiori davanti non sono il massimo, ma del resto in quel momento l'angolo di ripresa era quello, mentre per la parte posteriore, essendo un crop posso rimediare!
Grazie |
| sent on October 11, 2025 (4:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Never easy handheld, but they are the most genuine shots that give taste even if not "perfect", a beautiful shot set with excellent detail Mai facile a mano libera ma sono gli scatti più genuini e che danno gusto anche se non "perfetti", una bella ripresa ambientata con un ottimo dettaglio |
| sent on October 11, 2025 (9:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I think it should be taken into account that the shot was taken handheld, and with a lens that weighs more than 1kg, so difficulties are always around the corner. Personally I think given the difficulties the photo is not bad at all. Credo vada tenuto conto che lo scatto è stato eseguito a mano libera e con una lente che pesa più di 1kg quindi le difficoltà sono sempre dietro l'angolo. Personalmente penso viste le difficoltà la foto non sia niente male. |
| sent on October 11, 2025 (15:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I agree with Gianni Fazer and Pigi that shooting handheld is not easy at all. The subject is beautiful, but the cut given to the photo and the composition do not help to appreciate it. Good afternoon Sono daccordo con Gianni Fazer e Pigi che gli scatti eseguiti a mano libera non sono per niente facili. Il soggetto è bello, ma il taglio dato alla foto e la composizione non aiutano ad apprezzarlo. Buon pomeriggio |
| sent on October 12, 2025 (2:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Stunning Macros and Stunning Details !! Stupenda Macro e Stupendi Dettagli !!! |
| sent on October 12, 2025 (13:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I agree with those who preceded me that there is some imperfection in terms of parallelism and the detail is not so perfect on the entire wing. I think the blurred flowers of disturbance can be eliminated in post-production without too much difficulty. Concordo con chi mi ha preceduto che c'è qualche imperfezione in termini di parallelismo ed il dettaglio non è così perfetto su tutta l'ala. I fiori sfocati di disturbo ritengo si possano eliminare in postproduzione senza eccessive difficoltà. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
9.3 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
