What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 256000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 24, 2025 (22:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful close-up, very nice blurry. Bellissima ravvicinata, molto bello lo sfocato. |
| sent on September 30, 2025 (20:23)
Obbes i'm glad for the wonderful comment. Thank you very much. Greetings Leon |
| sent on November 11, 2025 (21:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A nice close-up of this rosebud, which however suffered from an ineffective maf and a background that was too present with several disturbing elements. Un bel primo piano di questo bocciolo di Rosa, che tuttavia ha risentito di una maf poco efficace e di uno sfondo troppo presente con diversi elementi di disturbo. |
| sent on November 12, 2025 (11:41)
You are probably a professional photographer...??? |
| sent on November 12, 2025 (13:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
No Leon, I'm just a hobbyist with about 40 years of experience, but other than that my comment is closely related to what can be seen by looking at your photo, nothing more! ;-) No Leon, sono solo un hobbista con circa 40 anni di esperienza, ma a parte questo il mio commento è strettamente legato a ciò che si può notare guardando la tua foto, niente di più! |
| sent on November 12, 2025 (14:46)
Then explain to me what this MAF is |
| sent on November 12, 2025 (17:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It's short for "focus", as pdc is short for "depth of field", "rr" stands for reproduction ratio and at the moment I can't think of any others... È l'abbreviazione di "messa a fuoco", come pdc è l'abbreviativo di "profondità di campo", "rr" sta per rapporto di riproduzione, FS sta per " Focus stacking", e al momento non me ne vengono in mente altri... |
| sent on November 12, 2025 (22:00)
And if I understand you correctly, you're saying that the picture is out of focus. |
| sent on November 13, 2025 (19:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Let's say that only a part of this is blurred, if you look at it in high resolution, you will see that the foreground part of the bud is slightly out of focus and being in the foreground you can see a lot! Diciamo che solo una parte di questa risulta sfocata, se la guardi in alta risoluzione, vedrai cha la parte in primo piano del bocciolo è leggermente fuori fuoco ed essendo in primo piano si nota molto ! |
| sent on November 13, 2025 (21:44)
And if I understand you correctly, you're saying that I should lower the resolution of the photos (from 24.2M to, for example, 2.7M) and it won't be visible... (like some people do) |
| sent on November 14, 2025 (0:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
No, I didn't say this and I can assure you that it would still be visible, but you shouldn't take it as an offense... No, non ho detto questo e ti posso assicurare che comunque sarebbe visibile, ma non devi prenderla come un'offesa... |
| sent on November 14, 2025 (1:05)
Yes, of course something will be visible,...but probably a lot, much less than if the photo is of high resolution. Also at exhibitions of photo societies and FIAP, they usually limit the resolution between 3M to 8M. But we know that the sharpness of a photo is not everything. Regards Leon |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |