What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 255000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 14, 2025 (19:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hi Luigi,
as owner of Zuiko 40 150 F4 Pro I have to say that this lens to be at f5.6 is much less sharp.
Am I wrong? ciao luigi,
da possessore di zuiko 40 150 f4 pro devo dire che questo obiettivo per essere a f 5.6 e' molto meno nitido.
mi sbaglio ? |
| sent on September 15, 2025 (0:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hi Tirelleo,
Making a comparison on sensations is a bit difficult, to be objective you should have taken the same photograph at the same exact moment and with the same light conditions, the same focal length and the same exposure, the same animal etc .. Here I was still freehand and I didn't have a steady hand.
To me it seems sharp, maybe the focus is not on the nearest eye, but you know these animals tend to move and I am not a wildlife photographer I got the timing wrong. 1/200 is too slow for this animal.
Ciao Tirelleo,
Fare un confronto su delle sensazioni è un pò difficile, per essere oggettivi bisognerebbe aver scattato la stessa fotografia nello stesso momento esatto e con le stesse condizioni di luce, stessa lunghezza focale e stessa esposizione, stesso animale ecc.. Qui ero comunque a mano libera e io non lo la mano ferma.
A me pare nitida, forse il fuoco non è sull'occhio più vicino, ma sai questi animali tendono a muoversi ed io non essendo un wildlife photographer ho sbagliato i tempi. 1/200 è troppo lento per questo animale.
|
| sent on September 15, 2025 (7:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Then it's micro-blur
Also because colors, micro contrast and blur are better than the already excellent 40/150 f4
Thanks Allora e' micromosso
Anche perché colori , micro contrasto e sfocato sono migliori del già ottimo 40/150 f4
Grazie |
| sent on September 26, 2025 (18:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
... I don't see any particular flaws,... If all my shots were like this... even! Excellent goal, but it doesn't agree with the expense and weight I have to carry, I'm happy with less, ... fantastic light that gives depth and accentuates the definition, excellent, hello G ...io non intravedo particolari difetti,...se tutti i miei scatti fossero così..magari! Ottimo obbiettivo, ma non va d'accordo con spesa e peso che devo portare, mi accontento di meno, ...luce comunque fantastica che dona profondità e accentua la definizione, ottima, ciao G |
| sent on October 12, 2025 (19:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very much you Luigi, this lens is clear from goosebumps! I have the 40 150 great for lightness and qi, but this 50 200 is from another planet! Well done and applause to the designers of OM System!!! The photo is beautiful! Bavissimo tu Luigi, questa lente e nitida da pelle d'oca! Ho il 40 150 ottimo per leggerezza e qi, ma questo 50 200 e di un altro pianeta! Bravi e un plauso ai progettisti di OM System!!!! La foto e bellissima! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
3.1 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
