What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on July 16, 2025 (19:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Lovely family! too bad for the very hard light that kills the definition. Bella famiglia! peccato per la luce molto dura che ammazza la definizione. |
| sent on July 17, 2025 (7:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
True.. but either I'm not skilled enough or I had no way to "soften" it. Anyway thanks for the comment Vero..ma o non sono abbastanza abile o non avevo modo di "ammorbidirla".. Cmq grazie per il commento |
| sent on July 17, 2025 (8:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
:-) Well, if the sunlight is strong and comes from above, almost vertically, there is not much you can do: if you take a portrait you will get two beautiful dark circles under your eyes; ditto here; so first of all you need a good and soft light, that is, the ideal would be to shoot in the morning with horizontal or almost horizontal light or in the evening, always with horizontal or almost horizontal light; here, for example, the top of the stork's head at the top and also of the one in the middle, as well as various parts of the wings in light, are already too exposed, while the blacks are definitely too black; increasing exposure would have been disastrous; You could lighten a little of the black in post production, but always up to a certain point; Too much white overexposure is irreparable..... in short, you always have to start with the right light :-) : good light! Beh, se la luce solare è forte e proviene dall'alto quasi verticale non c'è molto da fare: se fai un ritratto ti verranno due belle occhiaie scure; idem qui; quindi in primis occorre una luce buona e morbida, cioè l'ideale sarebbe scattare al mattino con luce orizzontale o quasi oppure alla sera, sempre con luce orizzontale o quasi; qui ad esempio la sommità della testa della cicogna in alto e anche di quella nel mezzo, oltre poi a varie parti in luce delle ali, risultano già fin troppo esposte, mentre i neri sono decisamente troppo neri; aumentare l'esposizione sarebbe stato disastroso; un poco del nero lo potresti schiarire in post produzione, ma sempre fino a un certo punto; il troppo bianco sovraesposto è invece irrimediabile.....insomma, bisogna sempre partire con la luce giusta : buona luce! |
| sent on July 17, 2025 (15:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Excellent analysis and irrefutable observations. By the way, I didn't tell you that I had a compulsory PDR because I was on the terrace of a building located more or less in front of the storks' building. I absolutely agree on the ideal time of light but, since it is an absolutely occasional and unplanned shot, you have to be satisfied. Surely I could have done more, but the terror that they would suddenly fly conditioned me a lot. Ottima analisi e inconfutabili osservazioni. Tra l'altro non vi ho detto che avevo un pdr obbligatorio perché mi trovavo sul terrazzo di un edificio posto più o meno di fronte a quello delle cicogne.. Sono assolutamente d'accordo sull'ora della luce ideale ma, trattandosi di una ripresa assolutamente occasionale e non programmata, bisogna accontentarsi.. Sicuramente avrei potuto fare di più, ma il terrore che all'improvviso volassero mi ha condizionato molto.. |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |