What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on April 15, 2025 (16:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I have a question, if I do any correction to small skin imperfections or makeup residues... can you still define a SOOC file?
For the record, this is not a SOOC file. Avrei una domanda, se faccio qualche correzione a piccole imperfezioni della pelle o residui di trucco... si può ancora definire un file SOOC?
Per dover di cronaca questo non è un file SOOC. |
| sent on April 15, 2025 (18:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I, who am anything but a portrait photographer, would say: yes for the image, no for the subject...
Greetings
GG Io, che tutto sono tranne che un "fotografaio" ritrattista, direi: si per l'immagine, no per il soggetto...
Un saluto
GG |
| sent on April 16, 2025 (15:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ I, who am anything but a portrait photographer, would say: yes for the image, no for the subject...
Greetings
GG „
Do you know Giordano that I didn't understand?
Sorry.
" Io, che tutto sono tranne che un "fotografaio" ritrattista, direi: si per l'immagine, no per il soggetto...
Un saluto
GG"
Sai Giordano che non ho capito?
Scusami.
|
| sent on April 16, 2025 (16:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I meant that I consider the cloning of a mole or a pimple irrelevant, if you do not work on the output parameters, to classify a portrait image as a post produced. It is different for the subject portrayed because in this way his true physiognomy is modified, moving away from reality and the original, approaching how we would like him to be ...
All this leaving aside to enter into the discussion on the fact that a jpg is more truthful than a raw in determining the true qualities of the camera and photographer...
I apologize if I had been too concise and unclear.
Gg Intendevo dire che ritengo ininfluenti la clonatura di un neo o di un brufolo, se non si lavora sui parametri di uscita, per classificare come post prodotta un'immagine di ritratto. Diverso è invece per il soggetto ritratto perché in questo modo si modifica la sua vera fisionomia allontanandosi dalla realtà e dall'originale avvicinandosi a come noi lo vorremmo...
Tutto questo tralasciando di entrare nella discussione sul fatto che un jpg sia più veritiero di un raw nel determinare le vere doti di macchina e fotografo...
Mi scuso se ero stato troppo sintetico e poco chiaro.
GG |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
39.8 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
