RCE Foto






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Macro and Flora
  4. » Untitled Photo

 
Untitled Photo...

Macro

View gallery (5 photos)

Untitled Photo sent on June 26, 2013 (9:20) by Albert04. 4 comments, 869 views.

at 55mm, 1/100 f/7.1, ISO 100, hand held.




View High Resolution 15.1 MP  



What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 256000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarjunior
sent on June 26, 2013 (11:57)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Bella foto Albert04.
Premetto che ho lo stesso corpo macchina che hai usato, ma sinceramente avrei usato dei parametri diversi.
Ad esempio mi sembra di capire che l'autofocus utilizzato è stato un parziale o valutativo.
Io avrei utilizzato uno "spot".
Poi il diaframma era f7,1 che inevitabilmente ti porta ad avere una ridotta profondità di campo e quindi delle zone sfocate del soggetto.
(forse con un diaframma a f16/f22 sarebbe venuta completamente a fuoco la rosa e sfocato lo sfondo).

Beautiful photo Albert04.
I state that I have the same camera body that you used, but honestly I would have used different parameters.
For example, I understand that the autofocus used was a partial or evaluative.
I would have used a "spot".
Then the diaphragm was f7, 1 which inevitably leads you to have a shallow depth of field and hence the focus areas of the subject.
(Perhaps with a diaphragm f16/f22 would come fully into focus the pink and blur the background).

user53661
avatar
sent on December 13, 2015 (20:57)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Bellissima foto complimenti!

Beautiful pictures congratulations!

avatarsenior
sent on December 13, 2015 (23:50)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


L'eleganza di questo scatto è senza pari...
complimenti!
Giovanni

The elegance of this shot is unparalleled ...
compliments!
John

avatarsenior
sent on June 16, 2016 (23:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Really delicate the colors. Very beautiful. mauro greetings


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me