What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on February 28, 2025 (5:19) | This comment has been translated
Excellent, congratulations! |
| sent on February 28, 2025 (7:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Magnificent Magnifico |
| sent on February 28, 2025 (8:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
You took home the shot anyway.
congratulations. Hai portato a casa comunque lo scatto.
Complimenti. |
| sent on February 28, 2025 (9:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It seems very good to me ... It is sufficient "large" for any digital use. or small print (bird books), for the rest of the 500,000 photos of birdlife in the gallery in my opinion those printed in large will be 0.000000000000000.... :-D
The 2x would have made the shot much more difficult due to the reduced angle and difficulty in framing and tracking the subject, also given the weight of the equipment ... It would also slow down the autofocus, soften the subject, and introduce aberrations.
To exaggerate the 1.4x could have been just
useful.PS
You shot at F8 ... now they will criticize you because an F4 should only be used at F4 :-D Mi sembra molto buona ...e sufficientemente "grande"per qualsiasi utilizzo digitale.
Il 2x ti avrebbe reso molto più difficile lo scatto causa angolo ridotto e difficoltà ad inquadrare ed inseguire il soggetto ,visto anche il peso dell'attrezzatura...Avrebbe anche rallentato l'autofocus ammorbidito il soggetto e introdotto aberrazioni..
poteva essere utile l'1,4x... Però se avessi avuto una A7r5 forse sarebbe stato sufficiente anche solo il crop |
| sent on February 28, 2025 (10:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
great close-up. The problem lies in the absence of references to the surrounding environment which would make the foreground even more exciting gran bel primo piano. il problema stà nell'assenza di riferimenti dell ambiente circostante che renderebbe il primo piano ancora piu' entusiasmante |
| sent on February 28, 2025 (21:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
beautiful photo, perfect framing !! bellissima foto, inquadratura perfetta !! |
| sent on March 01, 2025 (19:43) | This comment has been translated
Magnificent |
| sent on March 03, 2025 (7:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I agree with Mattia, @1200mm it would have been very difficult to frame him.
It is also true that this lens is not a fixed focal length and that, with a 2x noted, you would have had a 600-1200 fifths all in all easier than with a fixed 1200.
It's a real shame that Sony doesn't allow third-party TCs, they take a lot of meaning away from the Superteles lights Concordo con Mattia, @1200mm sarebbe stato difficilissimo inquadrarlo.
E' pur vero che questa lente non e' una focale fissa e che, con un 2x notato, avresti avuto un 600-1200 quinti tutto sommato più facile che con un 1200 fisso.
Peccato davvero che Sony non consenta i TC di Terze Parti, levano molto significato ai Supertele luminosi |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
4.9 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
