Sardinian flounder

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Birds

3.6 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

Passeriformi View gallery (32 photos)

Sardinian flounder sent on February 23, 2025 (9:56) by Fabrizio Zaccheddu. 6 comments, 187 views.

at 800mm, 1/1000 f/9.0, ISO 1000, hand held.

View High Resolution 3.6 MP

6 persons like it: Cesare Carloni, Gian Antonio Zapparoli, Gianni Fazer, Gion65, Siro, Vito Serra

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Mattia Campos

sent on February 23, 2025 (10:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I don't see all this super quality of the 200-800 on the R7 let alone a deadly autofocus !?
Out of 3 photos there is not one in focus ...
(But I'm not surprised... I know the behavior of the camera with this lens :)

Fabrizio Zaccheddu

sent on February 23, 2025 (10:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

In fact, I called the quality of this lens good. ;-) Be careful not to confuse sharpness and maf. They are two very different things. ;-)

Mattia Campos

sent on February 23, 2025 (10:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The 200-800 renders much better on FF (clearer and sharper images and more consistent autofocus) but if you can get the subjects at the right distance with good/acceptable light the quality will definitely be good... Otherwise the "limits" of the combination emerge (autofocus not always perfect, sharpness so-so and aberrations) also due to the air in the middle, at 800 on R7 the subject is "very" away, if the air is not perfect the photos do not come ;-)

Fabrizio Zaccheddu

sent on February 23, 2025 (10:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Well, I noticed the "limits" too, of course. But precisely from a lens that costs just over € 2000 and offers all these focal lengths I think it is difficult to expect more.
This is a photo of the fisherman taken yesterday. Conditions with very "murky" diffused light. In essence, the result, in my humble opinion, is fine.
https://www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=4997864&l=it

Gion65

sent on February 27, 2025 (23:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Beautiful Capture and Beautiful Backdrop !!

Gianni Fazer

sent on March 09, 2025 (12:55) | This comment has been translated

Magnificent

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.