RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Landscape (wilderness)
  4. » Untitled Photo

 
Untitled Photo...

bretagna e normandia

View gallery (20 photos)

Untitled Photo sent on October 12, 2011 (15:00) by Alessandro Viarino. 10 comments, 1342 views.

at 11mm, 1/2500 f/22.0, ISO 100, Cap Fréhel, France.

cap frehel, bretagna nikon d300s nikon 10-24mm iso 100 f/22 0,4s





What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 255000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarjunior
sent on October 17, 2011 (9:48)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


I tempi lunghi hanno reso la scena più suggestiva!

The times have long made the scene more impressive!

avatarjunior
sent on October 17, 2011 (10:16)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


L'ho postata attendendo critiche, perché non riesco a capire se è il diaframma molto chiuso che ha "impastato" le rocce (diffrazione??!!). su internet oltre a farsi le autodiagnosi per problemi di saluti MrGreen cerchiamo anche le cause di eventuali difetti alle nostre immagini! :-P a volte le foto che scatto con il 10-24 nikon mi sembrano molto poco nitide nei dettagli, come in questo caso...vorrei capire se realmente può essere la diffrazione per il diaframma troppo chiuso??


I posted waiting criticism, because I can not tell if the aperture is very close that has "mixed" rocks (diffraction?!). on the internet as well as being the self-diagnostic problems of greetings:-D we also causes defects of our images! :-P sometimes the pictures shot with the nikon 10-24 seem very unclear in detail, as in this case ... I would understand if it can really be the diffraction by the aperture closed too?

avatarjunior
sent on October 17, 2011 (10:58)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Con un supergrandangolare non hai effettivamente la necessità di arrivare a diaframmi così chiusi per regolare la pdc, immagino tu l'abbia quindi fatto per una questione di tempi. Direi che sicuramente una foto scattata a f22 è meno nitida di una scattata a f8 per via della diffrazione, per regolare i tempi, quindi, sarabbe meglio dotarsi di un filtro ND. Nel tuo caso specifico ritengo che la soluzione migliore sarebbe stata l'attesa, perchè l'inquadratura è molto buona ed anche l'angloazione con cui la luce illumina la scena è ok, è solo un po' presto. Aspettare il tramonto ti avrebbe dato una luce più radente, dei colori più caldi ed un cielo infinitamente migliore... Avresti potuto scattare con tempi lunghi anche a f8 o f11 preservando così la nitidezza ed avresti ottenuto un immagine molto migliore. Detto questo la tua foto mi piace molto.

P.S. Se si tratta dell'alba il discorso è valido al contrario (scattare prima con la luce radente del sole appena sorto)

With a fisheye not you actually need to achieve diaphragms so closed to adjust the pdc, I guess you did then made a matter of time. Would say that a photo taken at f22 is less clear for a shot at f8 because of diffraction, to adjust the timing, then, they would be better to have an ND filter. In your specific case I think that the best solution would be to wait, because the shot is very good and also the angloazione at which light illuminates the scene is ok, it's just a little 'soon. Wait for the sunset would have given a more oblique light, the warmest colors and a sky infinitely better ... You could take a long time even with f8 or f11 preserving the sharpness and you would get a much better picture. That said I really like your picture.

PS If this is the dawn holds true in reverse (taken before the raking light of the rising sun)

avatarjunior
sent on October 17, 2011 (12:33)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


A me piace nella composizione anche se non mi pare molto nitida. Probabilmente dipende dal diaframma chiuso troppo. Forse si anche la luce è un pò troppo piatta. Provare con un pizzico di smart sharpen per renderla un pò più nitida?

I like the composition though it does not seem very clear. Probably depends on the aperture too. Maybe you even light is a little too flat. Try a pinch of smart sharpen to make it a little clearer?

avatarsenior
sent on October 17, 2011 (14:05)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Quoto Luca77. Immagine e composizione molto bella, ma con un filtro ND e quindi un diaframma tipo f/11 ne avrebbe guadagnato in nitidezza. Ciao

Quoto Luca77. Image composition and very beautiful, but with an ND filter and then a diaphragm type f/11 would have gained in clarity. Hello

avatarjunior
sent on October 17, 2011 (15:19)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


grazie ragazzi per i consigli!!!

thanks guys for the advice!

avatarsupporter
sent on October 17, 2011 (17:21)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Bella la composizione e il movimento dell'acqua, concordo su ND e diaframma meno chiuso, forse sei stato anche troppo leggero in post con lo sharp ;-)
ciao.

Beautiful composition and movement of the water, I agree with ND and less closed iris, maybe you've been too light in post with the sharp ;-)
hello.

avatarjunior
sent on October 17, 2011 (23:09)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


i tempi lunghi da soli non servono a fare una bella foto, qui poi anche la luce non ti aiuta molto.
Scusa la schiettezza ma osservando la tua foto non trovo che la composizione mi aiuti a leggere l'immagine, tutto apparentemente converge verso il centro del fotogramma, lì purtroppo però non c'è nulla...
...la parte sinistra è poi imho disturbata da una luce troppo invadente e dura, tutta la serie di massi tagliati a bordo del fotogramma poi penalizza ulteriormente la foto.
Scusa se sono stato troppo pesante, ma prendila come un'opinione personale, vedo che ad altri la composizione sembra essere cmq piaciuta...Confuso

the long time alone will not serve to make a nice picture, then here also the light does not help you much.
Excuse my bluntness but looking at your picture I do not find that the composition to help me read the image, all apparently converge towards the center of the frame, but unfortunately there is nothing there ...
The left side ... then imho disturbed by a light too intrusive and hard, the whole series of rock cut edge of the frame then further penalizes the photo.
Sorry if I was too heavy, but take it as a personal opinion, I see that other composition seems to be loved ... cmq: fconfuso:

avatarjunior
sent on October 18, 2011 (7:25)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Figurati...se avessi voluto dei complimenti "tanto per" l'avrei postata su facebook! In un forum tecnico sono tanto piacevoli i complimenti quanto utili le critiche costruttive ed istruttive!
Ciao ciao, Ale

Imagine ... if I wanted to compliment "so much for the" I posted on facebook! In a technical forum are so nice compliments how useful constructive criticism and educational!
Hello, hello, Ale

avatarjunior
sent on November 20, 2012 (17:03)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Bella foto, contando che con i tempi lunghi entra troppa luce, non in questo caso

Nice picture, considering that with the long time enters too much light, not in this case


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me