RCE Foto






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Still Life
  4. » Untitled Photo

 
Untitled Photo...

Varie

View gallery (9 photos)

Untitled Photo sent on October 11, 2011 (16:33) by Ilgaro. 36 comments, 17152 views.  [editors pick]

,

Riflesso Canon EOS 350D Canon EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro USM f/3.5 0,025 sec (1/40) ISO 200 #Reflection #Riflessi



184 persons like it: Afrikachiara, Alanne, Alberto Ghizzi Panizza, Alberto Sobrero, Alberto.77, Alcoldrum, Aldred, Alessandro Antico, Alessandro Ghurum Carini, Alexander93, Alvigini Corrado, Andreamarchese, Andreamontalbano, Andreascaffidi, Andrew90, Angela, Angelo Butera, Angeloster, Antonio77, Antoniobuccella, Axl76, Balotts, Batstone79, Beldigilberto, Bianca, Biomeccanico, Bosley, Carminecianni, Chico84, Cioccolataia, Ciska, Cisky1978, Cla02, Claudio Dubbiosi, Coffee, Cola, Dalzottomarco, DanieleIurissevich, Dantes, Davide Tosetti, Davide_Palmisano_cicciopettola, Dibi88, Diego_77, Dino Quinto, Donrobus, Dorian, Egargiulo, El Gaucho De La Pampa, Elias Piccioni, Enny, Eoin88, Fabio Castagna, Fabio79, Fabrizio Prota, Farhad906, Fasoad, Fede Jp, Felice Di Palma, Felux69, Flaviog, Francesco Battista, Francesco Cassulo, Francesco Fasulo, Francesco Iafelice, Francescoc, Franco Marciandi, Francosan69, Fulcontact, Gianluca Porciani, Gianpietro Perinelli, Giorgiaschuma, Giovabubi, Giovanni Colicchia, Giovanni Riccardi, Giovanni T., Giud1920, Giusppe, Gustiweb, Hamed2240, Hussain Mahmood, I-Felix, IlDilettante, Ingdax76, Ivan73, Jem, Jhon, Johnjz, Juza, Kermit58, Korsoo, Kykko, L'occhiodelcigno, L. Perchy, LeleChenny, LorenzoGiovanardi, Lorenzo_rosa, Lucas , Lucavillano, Lucini65, L_perro, Mago77, Marco Bonetti, Marco Risoldi, Marcounafoto, Marinaio, MarsCr, Martor, Mascellable, Massimo Zanardo, Mastro78, Matanò Francesco, Matley Siena, Matteo Molfino, Mattiaoliva, Mauro Farsi, Maxdraco, Michele 81, Mike76, MikeCuo, Mikmata, Minotaurus, MoGn3, Morpheuz, Mowgli, Netttto23, Nicola Dal Sacco, Nikodemo1973, Nordend4612, Oceanoprofondo7, Palomino76, Paolo Corona, Paolo Orfino, Paolo Sertorelli, Paolo Vegan73, Paolo-tave, Paologiovanetti, Pentax, Phoenix78, Pierangelo67, Piergiorgio Piccione, Pietro.c, Pietro2536, Piux, Ravi, Ravo, Riccardo Arena Trazzi, Riccardo Spigno, Riki, Robbrig, Roberto1977, Robertogiordana, Rosamaria Bidoli, Rravelli, Rudi59, Rvernava, S3rg10, Samuele Surico, Sandro Cressi, Sanja, Sasasicilyuno, Sercarlo, Shark127, Shotofgod, Shuda89, Simone Miotto, Siragusa.v, Sma, Spartan, Stefania Saffioti, Stefano Coghene, Ste_g89, Tajson , Tato, Technophil, Testadura65, Tilacino, Umberto Moroni, Vinsss, Wideanglesrock, Xborg82, Yobre, Zeus79, Zman, Zoemanu


PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 198000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avataradmin
sent on November 28, 2011 (9:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The colors and selective focus creating great pictures!

avatarjunior
sent on November 28, 2011 (9:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I personally find that the reflection of the photographer and the photo of the house ruin, even cutting convince me

avatarsupporter
sent on November 28, 2011 (10:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Strange! Just yesterday I was there with the macro Sigma intent to seek the same result!
excellent result for me! I like the reflection of the photographer (and it would be almost impossible to do without, mind
Greetings

avatarsupporter
sent on November 28, 2011 (10:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

This time I'm sorry for Juza but just do not see it as a photo of the week! Usually Juza guesses forever! Strange! The author does not take offense but sincerity has a price ...

avatarsenior
sent on November 28, 2011 (12:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I find it rather amazing really, as I send a very strong emotion. I believe that the technique inmportante, but then if there is no feeling in what you do, then all is lost. So pictures really deserved, of course according to my personal taste.

avatarsupporter
sent on November 28, 2011 (13:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I understand Francis did not put into question their tastes! The judges liked it and that's okay! In my opinion, however, a minimum of technical precision it takes! Sorry, but there is nothing here: That bit of PDC that would make sense if there is availed aesthetics. The contrast is not satisfactory, even the colors, the cut unhappy, even I can see the blur. In terms of emotion I do not own it transmits. I insist that this is my personal analysis and should hear someone else because the comments are so few ......

avatarsenior
sent on November 28, 2011 (14:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Tastes are tastes, but 2 photos of the week "Macro and flora" and 0 "Birds" it seems strange, particularly in light of the fact that the "Birds" is the most sought after "Landscapes". And this week, including the dipper of Gennaro64, the nightjar of Prof Chaos, gannets and other Fava was spoiled for choice, at least in my opinion. I would keep always a picture of the fixed week for the sections "historical" ;-)
Greetings

Alessandro

avatarsenior
sent on November 28, 2011 (15:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I understand Francis does not put into question their tastes! The judges liked it and that's okay! In my opinion, however, a minimum of technical precision it takes! Sorry, but there is nothing here: That bit of PDC that would make sense if there is availed aesthetics. The contrast is not satisfactory, even the colors, the cut unhappy, even I can see the blur. In terms of emotion I do not own it transmits. I insist that this is my personal analysis and should hear someone else because the comments are so few ......


Your technical analysis Archangel is more than correct although I think a photo should go beyond these parameters.
The emotional factor is entirely subjective and obviously played here for the benefit of ..
Also I've always wondered what are the criteria that apply to the choice of Juza FDS ie, Juza also uses the opinionand co-workers, or is it its own unique and personal style you decide on a photo will be worthwhile?
In other words, what is the photographic culture that puts in expressing opinions and give merit?


user1166
avatar
sent on November 28, 2011 (15:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello, personally is a shot that leaves me very puzzled. Apart from the emotions that may or may not raise (to me no, but I respect those of others), I think that has nothing original and the cut is very rough (I can cut the entry angle of the eye! Least not at least a little bit so that makes me think of a compositional choice uncorrected).
Just nelll'ambito a sincere and fruitful discussion ;-)
Hello

avataradmin
sent on November 28, 2011 (16:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Contrast, color and composition seem very good, and overall create a photo that captures attention and that led to the selection of photos of the week.

It 'a photo a little more "artistic" and less technical than the average of the selected photos in the category macro: in this case, I gave more weight to the overall result that the image quality, which is obviously conditioned by time and by slow very narrow depth of field.

The fact that this week there were two photos selected in the macro is still an exception!

user1166
avatar
sent on November 28, 2011 (17:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Juza, forgive sincerity, but, while appreciating the reply, my concerns remain.
You say that "contrast, color and composition look very good." Let's say that the iris blue iris is less trivial than brown and blue is natural and contrasted in an unnatural manner. The yield of the skin on my monitor seems to turn yellow, especially at the level of the upper eyelid, but it could be precisely my monitor. The composition, well, that priprio no. And 'cut both the inner and outer corner of the eye, so minimal cuts (yet present and visible) that even the close-warranted.
The reduced pdc and selective focus within the field of personal taste. Do you like a lot, and it makes no sense to discuss it here precisely because very subjective. But, frankly, a focus there, where it is actually falling, I do not think anything functional.
I would add, finally, that in a recovery so "macro", anthat small imperfections are of great importance and so I proceeded to clone smudge of mascara on the lower area between the folds of the skin. But my ides would be a perfectionist splitting hairs, then those of the rebate:-D
Also as part of a fruitful mutual exchange of views on the shoot and photography:-D

avatarsenior
sent on November 28, 2011 (19:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Juza,
I agree with Rubacolor and Fladane, I find that the trigger is of inferior quality
compared to the level to which we have become accustomed, in particular, as well as a slight shake
on which you can also fly, I believe that the composition amputates small portions
eye on both sides, is not exactly the best, but the reflection does not seem so pleasant.
I do not want the author are personal considerations, shared or not.

user181
avatar
sent on November 28, 2011 (23:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

[IMHO]

To me this photo does not say anything ... you want to see examples of what a real MACRO in the eye? Here, as you want

I do not want to be controversial or unpleasant, just honest ... this photo makes me think of those taking so long to experiment without too much effort (I have made dozens when I just bought the camera and I did not know still use decently). I forgive the author.

Indeed there is no photo in "historical" section excellent birds that could win on contests and competitions be published manuals and magazines as are perfect, and exciting for all the work and effort that is behind ... bah! :-)

avatarjunior
sent on November 29, 2011 (9:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

And Tommy

avatarsupporter
sent on November 29, 2011 (12:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Beast envy .. joke of course. But I think sometimes we lose a bit 'all the technicalities. It 's true that there are many similar macro executed to perfection and without the slightest smear technique .. but that argument is? We want to see with a magnifying glass the most beautiful pictures ever .. bet that we are the micro mossso a maf not perfect or a little apt pdc .. the photos (not purely scientific or didactic) and they must have an artistic component something (sometimes difficult to understand) that makes them beautiful. This photo is very beautiful for me! Compliementi to Ilgaro .. especially if you are a beginner and really wants to take pictures! Photo of the week deserved for me!


PS: Just for laugh ..



Nice picture though .. I lowered the point of recovery, the ocleft eye is not well focused and I would have cut a hair over to put the eyes in the upper third.

Now who tells him to McCurry will not be photos of the week;

Joking .. take it easy!

avatarjunior
sent on November 29, 2011 (13:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks viaggiatorenotturno for the nice comment and for the encouragement! :-P
Hello

Tommy

avatarjunior
sent on November 29, 2011 (15:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I like .... I do not have the number of McCurry ....... :-D

avatarsenior
sent on November 29, 2011 (15:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

@ Family Night. Well even if joking, compare image reports to a macro does not seem a very apt example, since the purpose of one and of the other gender are different things.

Hello
Luca

avatarsenior
sent on November 29, 2011 (15:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

@ Family Night. Well even if joking, compare image reports to a macro does not seem a very apt example, since the purpose of one and of the other gender are different things.


Flawless ..
The way I see the picture contains all the flaws described above while acknowledging that it can be pleasant. And it does not feel like the author, I personally do not like:-D.
Fds to be a "special edition" (I think that he understood that he was made a special podium and unpublished) was supposed to impress the observer and apparently leaves a lot of doubts ..

avatarsupporter
sent on November 29, 2011 (16:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

@ Family Night. Well even if joking, compare image reports to a macro does not seem a very apt example, since the purpose of one and of the other gender are different things.


I do not follow .. the "notes" that I moved the photos of this that McCurry (pretty good anyway) are valid for the scope of the report (by the way that is clearly posted a photo studied and posing) and then it seems to me that even if the parallel of different kinds there may be.
Unless you think that the kind of "macro" there is no room for the artistic side. I do not even mean at all that might be. Maybe this shot is a bit 'to the limit in cat Macro but it is a beautiful image without a doubt.
Every week would be many photos worthy and sometimes choices Juza may be different from what we would do but I think Juza longer has the pulse of the situation and a vision that allows him to reward picture a bit 'different from usual .. then I meanis not that vincan money .. :-D


PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me