What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 19, 2024 (11:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
What a show, an exceptional job! Truly superlative in terms of detail and cleanliness Che spettacolo, un lavoro eccezionale! Veramente superlativa in termini di dettaglio e pulizia |
| sent on November 19, 2024 (14:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The image is very very beautiful, in terms of detail, even on the 'small' nebular regions present it is excellent. I know, but it could be an oversight of mine that I'm not sure about, maybe some artifact due to denoise.
Great job anyway, congratulations L'immagine è molto molto bella, in termini di dettaglio, anche sulle 'piccole' regioni nebulari presenti è ottimo. Noto, ma potrebbe essere una svista mia di cui non sono sicuro, forse qualche artefatto dovuto al denoise.
Gran bel lavoro comunque, complimenti |
| sent on November 19, 2024 (16:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great work, galaxy not immediately easy to obtain; here, on the other hand, the detail is all there and is correctly exposed without burnt areas.
I also agree on the (perhaps) use of a little too much denoise: I personally (but I understand that it's my taste) don't mind astronomical photos (but also not) with a very slight "grain" at all but rather I find them more, how to say, "true".
I often notice that the concern to remove the grain at all costs ends up making the images almost fake, not real.
Gran bel lavoro, galassia non immediatamente facile da ottenere; qua invece il dettaglio c'è tutto ed è esposta correttamente senza zone bruciate.
Concordo anch'io sul (forse) utilizzo di un po' troppo denoise: a me personalmente (ma capisco che è un mio gusto) le foto astronomiche (ma anche non) con una leggerissima "grana" non dispiacciono affatto ma anzi le trovo più, come dire, "vere".
Spesso noto che la preoccupazione di togliere a tutti i costi la grana finisce poi per rendere le immagini quasi finte, non reali.
|
| sent on November 20, 2024 (8:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Show.... Hello Spettacolo....ciao |
| sent on November 20, 2024 (14:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
More than the denoise, I think it may be the starless base that appears a little strong, perhaps.. maybe I'm wrong! Più che il denoise credo possa essere la base starless ad apparire un pochino forte, forse.. magari mi sbaglio! |
| sent on November 20, 2024 (23:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you all for the appreciation.
However, I remember that you are viewing a painting of about 1.5 meters diagonally at 50cm from the nose 8-)
Francesco, I don't understand what you mean by "starless base a little strong"... Grazie a tutti per gli apprezzamenti.
Ricordo comunque che state visionando un quadro di circa 1,5 mt di diagonale a 50cm dal naso 
Francesco, non ho capito cosa intendi con "base starless un pochino forte"... |
| sent on November 21, 2024 (14:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I imagined you had started from a starless version of the file to highlight nebulosity, dust, etc. Sometimes, in the starless version, areas appear similar to a file with extreme denoise that has created artifacts.
It's not like that?
It's clearly not a criticism, of course!! I am amazed by this image. Ho immaginato tu fossi partito da una versione starless del file per evidenziare nebulosità, polveri ecc. A volte, nella versione starless, appaiono delle aree simili a un file con denoise estremo che ha creato artefatti.
Non è così?
Non è chiaramente una critica, ci mancherebbe!! Io sono strabiliato da questa immagine. |
| sent on November 21, 2024 (16:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I asked for the simple fact that I didn't understand the meaning of your statement, I didn't really understand what you meant, nothing more. Actually I stretch the full image, sometimes I work starless perhaps to balance the colors without compromising those of the stars, but the denoise is also applied to the stars as they appear more defined. Artifacts.. I don't know, actually if I look at the original file I see the same details, maybe noisier and here more defined, but I don't see artifacts or details that don't exist in the original :-/ Chiedevo per il semplice fatto che non avevo capito il significato della tua affermazione, non avevo proprio capito cosa intendevi, nulla più. In realtà eseguo uno stretch all'immagine completa, a tratti lavoro starless magari per bilanciare i colori senza compromettere quelli delle stelle, però il denoise viene applicato anche alle stelle in quanto appaiono più definite. Artefatti.. non so, in realtà se guardo il file originale vedo gli stessi dettagli, magari più rumorosi e qui più definiti, ma non ci vedo artefatti ovvero dettagli che nell'originale non esistono  |
| sent on November 21, 2024 (16:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I don't see them either :-)
Nemmeno io li vedo 
|
| sent on November 22, 2024 (9:37) | This comment has been translated
Wonderful! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
25.4 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
