What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on July 07, 2024 (23:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Intensely penetrating
Lodi
Mat Intensamente penetrante
Lodi
Mat |
| sent on July 08, 2024 (5:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Mat Grazie Mat |
| sent on July 26, 2024 (12:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Alt.If you want to make a portrait, I don't like it.
If you want to make a precise focus, on the eye, just to show how that lens behaves, that's fine with me.
My attention is there, on the eye, leaving out, instead, the part of the composition dedicated to the "portrait".
Honestly, this...."obsession" with the minimum diaphragm, has tired me.
It is, almost, a competition.
Let's not confuse the "creative" capacity with the minimum aperture..... It may be that the photographs, at full aperture, leave room for imagination, but the sharpness, or the engraving are different things.
The experience of the moment, the subject, the light..... These are things that must be taken into consideration.
I say it to you, because you know I'm honest.
Greetings !!
Alt.
Se vuoi fare un ritratto,non mi piace.
Se vuoi fare una messa a fuoca precisa, sull'occhio, tanto per far vedere come si comporta quell'obiettivo mi sta bene.
La mia attenzione è lì, sull'occhio tralasciando,invece, la parte della composizione dedicata al "ritratto".
Onestamente, questa...."ossessione" del diaframma minimo, mi ha stancato.
E ,quasi, una competizione.
Non confondiamo la capacità "creativa" con il diaframma minimo.....può darsi che le fotografie ,a tutta apertura, lasciano spazio all'immaginazione ,ma la nitidezza, o l' incisione sono cose diverse.
L'esperienza dell'attimo , il soggetto , la luce..... sono cose che devono essere prese in considerazione.
Lo dico a te,perchè sai che sono onesto.
Un saluto !!
|
| sent on July 26, 2024 (16:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the comment Maurizio. I wanted an emotional portrait, where the eye was the communicative center. The light lent itself well to a dark atmosphere. Grazie del commento Maurizio. Io volevo un ritratto emozionale, dove l'occhio fosse il centro comunicativo. La luce si è prestata bene per un'atmosfera dark. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
45.4 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
