What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on June 06, 2013 (16:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
With a similar aperture diffraction is now in ambush. Lack of clarity on the subject. Con un diaframma simile la diffrazione è subito in aguato. Scarsa la nitidezza sul soggetto. |
| sent on June 06, 2013 (17:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Pierluigi. by a master of the suggestions are always welcome. I've also done with larger aperture, but I lost too much pdc being so close to the subject. Thank you again, hello. Grazie Pierluigi. da un maestro i consigli sono sempre ben accetti. Ne ho fatto anche con diaframma più aperto, ma perdevo troppa pdc essendo così vicino al soggetto. Grazie ancora, ciao. |
| sent on June 06, 2013 (20:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I say little better but good and quoto pigi ..... eventually the fire does not exist in this picture! Hello! ;-) Io dico meglio poca ma buona e quoto pigi.....alla fine il fuoco non esiste in questa immagine! Ciao! |
| sent on June 08, 2013 (16:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
there is no maf anywhere Stefano with the 100/2.8 macro should count the hairs of the bee then what good is a pose than eight seconds + aperture f/32. a greeting Jerry non esiste la maf da nessuna parte Stefano con il 100/2.8 macro si dovrebbero contare i peli dell'ape poi a cosa serve una posa di otto secondi + diaframma f/32. un saluto Jerry |
| sent on June 08, 2013 (22:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello, Cave11. Hello, Jerry. Then failed experiment ... Ciao, Cave11. Ciao, Jerry. Allora esperimento fallito... |
| sent on July 12, 2014 (1:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Stephen, I'm sorry but I can not share the previous posts. Even a failed experiment brings a wealth of experience. A word of advice, if I can of course, given that the bee had died you could try with the focus staking, a series of images with a diaphragm acceptable to the various markings, and the result would have been different. If you do not know the technique you go to youtube and you'll have to play around that. :-P hello IVAN Ciao Stefano, scusa ma non posso che condividere i post precedenti. Anche un esperimento fallito porta il suo bagaglio di esperienza. Un consiglio, se posso naturalmente, visto che l'ape era deceduta potevi provare con il focus staking, una serie di immagini con un diaframma accettabile a focature diverse e il risultato sarebbe stato diverso. Se non conosci la tecnica vai in youtube ed avrai di che sbizzarrirti. ciao IVAN |
| sent on July 12, 2014 (9:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello, Ivan. I have not tried focus stacking, that would be a good opportunity. .. Of course I did several shots with different settings, I chose to post this to see how far you can push yourself with the closure of the diaphragm getting shots still acceptable. I also pointed out in the caption exposure time, as many as 8 seconds Iso 400! I was amazed! Thanks for the advice, hello Ciao, Ivan. Non ho ancora provato il focus stacking, quella sarebbe stata una buona occasione. .. Naturalmente feci diversi scatti, con impostazioni differenti, ho scelto di postare questa per vedere fin dove ci si può spingere con la chiusura del diaframma ottenendo scatti ancora accettabili. Ho evidenziato anche in didascalia il tempo di esposizione, ben 8 secondi con Iso 400! A me ha stupito! Grazie per i consigli, ciao |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |