What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on May 17, 2024 (8:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Outstanding IQ, reference equipment QI eccezionale, attrezzatura di riferimento |
| sent on May 17, 2024 (9:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In my opinion those photos there are very good even with a normal 35 mm, with 100 Mpx you only get a larger geometric format image.
In other words, if you don't print in a really large format, 100 Mpx is completely useless, money wasted, considering that going to make racy crops is never, technically, a good idea.
Compositionally, great photo!
Secondo me quelle foto lì si fanno benissimo anche con una normalissima 35 mm, con 100 Mpx si ottiene solo un'immagine di formato geometrico più grande.
Detta in altre parole, se uno non stampa in formato veramente grande, 100 Mpx sono del tutto inutili, soldi buttati via, considerando oltretutto che andare a fare ritagli spinti non è mai, tecnicamente, una buona idea.
Compositivamente, ottima foto!
|
| sent on May 17, 2024 (9:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
1/200 I see it as risky as time... 1/200 lo vedo azzardato come tempo... |
| sent on May 17, 2024 (10:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A wonderful photo, congratulations! :-) Una foto stupenda, complimenti! |
| sent on May 17, 2024 (10:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Excellent portrait of
Peter Eccelente ritratto
Ppietro |
| sent on May 17, 2024 (10:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In my opinion those photos there are very good even with a normal 35 mm, with 100 Mpx you only get a larger geometric format image.
Deleted MFs are of no use to a m. :-D Secondo me quelle foto lì si fanno benissimo anche con una normalissima 35 mm, con 100 Mpx si ottiene solo un'immagine di formato geometrico più grande.
Cancellate le MF non servono a una m.  |
| sent on May 17, 2024 (13:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
What sharpness, and how blurry.... A lot of stuff Che nitidezza, e che sfocato.... Tanta roba |
| sent on May 17, 2024 (15:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Yes.. Let's say that the megapixels are all there.. And the "lightness" did not make itself felt in the quality.
At these resolutions.. face in focus, but already the hair behind "gasps" a little. It's not bad.
Just one observation.
How close can an optics like this close before hearing diffraction? Si.. diciamo che i megapixel ci son tutti.. e la "leggerezza" non si è fatta sentire nella qualità.
A queste risoluzioni.. viso a fuoco, ma già i capelli dietro "boccheggiano" un po'. Non è male.
Solo una osservazione.
Quanto può chiudere un'ottica come questa prima di sentire diffrazione? |
| sent on May 17, 2024 (17:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice realization and good yield... :-) :-) bella realizzazione e buona la resa... |
| sent on May 17, 2024 (20:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Really wonderful 3d perception, typical of the MF.... As a result, the result is a beautiful close-up....
Then I'm 500mm seems like a lot of stuff, but a lot of it... :-o Percezione 3d davvero stupenda, tipica del MF.... Di conseguenza ne viene fuori un Bellisssimo primo piano....
Poi sto 500mm sembra tanta roba, ma tanta tanta... |
| sent on May 17, 2024 (22:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I wonder how much PP goes on this shot that shines x naturalness, sharpness, skin tone and blurry; if it were jpg OutOfCamera and/or with very little PP it would be a lot of stuff. Mi chiedo quanta PP ci sta su questo scatto che brilla x naturalezza, nitidezza, tonalità della pelle e sfocato; se fosse jpg OutOfCamera e/o con pochissima PP sarebbe davvero tantissima roba. |
| sent on May 17, 2024 (23:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Pietro, don't worry that there will be little PP.... Pietro, tranquillo che di PP c'e ne sarà poca.... |
| sent on May 17, 2024 (23:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ How close can an optics like this close before hearing diffraction? „
I'd say it's best not to close down past f/11.
“ I wonder how much PP fits on this shot „
very little... I only did denoise ai (the one from Adobe Camera RAW) and minimal color and contrast adjustments. " Quanto può chiudere un'ottica come questa prima di sentire diffrazione?"
direi che è meglio non chiudere oltre f/11.
" Mi chiedo quanta PP ci sta su questo scatto"
pochissima... ho fatto solo denoise ai (quello di Adobe Camera RAW) e minime regolazioni di colore e contrasto. |
| sent on May 18, 2024 (10:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
As usual when I bought Z6 and Z7 after a while the version 2 was announced, not even to do it on purpose it happened to me again with the GFX 100s, I had heard various rumors a few months ago but as usual the shopkeeper says to me: but no, they are rumors, it will take years before another one comes out, I hope that the improvements compared to the S are marginal, I'm not complaining of course, I don't expect performance like my Z7ll, I already knew it before, I hope there will be a comparative review soon maybe between 100s L and ll come al solito quando comprai z6 e z7 dopo un po venne annunciata la versione 2 neanche a farlo apposta mi e' ricapitato con la gfx 100s, avevo sentito vari rumors qualche mese fa ma come al solito il negoziante mi fa: ma no, son voci, ci vorranno anni prima che ne esca un altra, spero che le migliorie rispetto alla s siano marginali, non mi lamento si intende, non mi aspetto prestazioni come la mia z7ll, lo sapevo gia' prima, spero ci sara' presto una recensione comparativa magari tra 100s l e ll |
| sent on May 18, 2024 (10:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Well if you got it with the 1600€ discount, you have little to complain about... Beh se l'hai presa coi 1600€ di sconto, hai poco da lamentarti... |
| sent on May 18, 2024 (10:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
So much for sharpness! ;-)
You can read the brand of the watch: sekonda and 50 metres.
It was shot with a 500mm. Alla faccia della nitidezza!
Si può leggere la marca dell'orologio: sekonda e 50 metres.
E scattata con un 500mm. |
| sent on May 18, 2024 (13:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
More than sharpness, I would talk about the quality of detail, realism, naturalness and overall 3D perception..... Più che di nitidezza Io parlerei di qualità del dettaglio, realismo, naturalezza e percezione 3D complessiva..... |
| sent on May 18, 2024 (16:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
That's right, Orablu and thank you: I couldn't find the words. ;-) Giusto, Orablu e grazie: non mi venivano le parole. |
| sent on May 18, 2024 (18:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ I'd say it's better not to close beyond f/11. „
I'd be curious to see the pfc at F11.. One of the reasons why I stayed in APS is precisely that extra thread of PDC with the same opening. " direi che è meglio non chiudere oltre f/11."
Sarei curioso di vedere la pfc a F11.. Uno dei motivi per cui sono rimasto in aps è proprio quel filo di pdc in più a parità di apertura. |
| sent on May 18, 2024 (18:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ I'd be curious to see the pfc at F11.. One of the reasons why I stayed in aps is just that extra pdc wire with the same aperture „ I say that, that of a (for me) pseudo larger pdc from a smaller sensor, is the last of the parameters to take into account when choosing the size of a sensor...
For example: look at this one with the MF at f/4.5 that pdc that has... Moreover, at 12,800ISO...
https://i.postimg.cc/kgXDrMQ8/DSCF0439-da-R-2-19mp.jpg " Sarei curioso di vedere la pfc a F11.. Uno dei motivi per cui sono rimasto in aps è proprio quel filo di pdc in più a parità di apertura" Io dire che, quella della di una(per me) pseudo maggiore pdc da un sensore più piccolo, è l'ultimo dei parametri da tenere in considerazione nella scelta delle dimensioni di un sensore...
Per esempio: guarda questa con la MF a f/4.5 che pdc che ha... (oltretutto a 12.800iso...)
i.postimg.cc/kgXDrMQ8/DSCF0439-da-R-2-19mp.jpg |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
80.6 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
