RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Portrait and Fashion
  4. » Simon, in Milan

 
Simon, in Milan...

Ritratti

View gallery (19 photos)

Simon, in Milan sent on May 17, 2024 (7:45) by Juza. 20 comments, 2546 views. [retina]

, 1/200 f/5.6, ISO 400, hand held.




View High Resolution 80.6 MP   Buy Usage License  





What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsupporter
sent on May 17, 2024 (8:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Outstanding IQ, reference equipment

avatarsenior
sent on May 17, 2024 (9:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

In my opinion those photos there are very good even with a normal 35 mm, with 100 Mpx you only get a larger geometric format image.
In other words, if you don't print in a really large format, 100 Mpx is completely useless, money wasted, considering that going to make racy crops is never, technically, a good idea.
Compositionally, great photo!

avatarsenior
sent on May 17, 2024 (9:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

1/200 I see it as risky as time...

avatarsenior
sent on May 17, 2024 (10:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

A wonderful photo, congratulations! :-)

avatarsupporter
sent on May 17, 2024 (10:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Excellent portrait of
Peter

avatarsenior
sent on May 17, 2024 (10:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

In my opinion those photos there are very good even with a normal 35 mm, with 100 Mpx you only get a larger geometric format image.
Deleted MFs are of no use to a m. :-D

avatarjunior
sent on May 17, 2024 (13:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

What sharpness, and how blurry.... A lot of stuff

avatarjunior
sent on May 17, 2024 (15:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Yes.. Let's say that the megapixels are all there.. And the "lightness" did not make itself felt in the quality.
At these resolutions.. face in focus, but already the hair behind "gasps" a little. It's not bad.
Just one observation.
How close can an optics like this close before hearing diffraction?

avatarsupporter
sent on May 17, 2024 (17:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Nice realization and good yield... :-) :-)

avatarsenior
sent on May 17, 2024 (20:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Really wonderful 3d perception, typical of the MF.... As a result, the result is a beautiful close-up....
Then I'm 500mm seems like a lot of stuff, but a lot of it... :-o

avatarsenior
sent on May 17, 2024 (22:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I wonder how much PP goes on this shot that shines x naturalness, sharpness, skin tone and blurry; if it were jpg OutOfCamera and/or with very little PP it would be a lot of stuff.

avatarsenior
sent on May 17, 2024 (23:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Pietro, don't worry that there will be little PP....

avataradmin
sent on May 17, 2024 (23:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

How close can an optics like this close before hearing diffraction?

I'd say it's best not to close down past f/11.
I wonder how much PP fits on this shot

very little... I only did denoise ai (the one from Adobe Camera RAW) and minimal color and contrast adjustments.

avatarjunior
sent on May 18, 2024 (10:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

As usual when I bought Z6 and Z7 after a while the version 2 was announced, not even to do it on purpose it happened to me again with the GFX 100s, I had heard various rumors a few months ago but as usual the shopkeeper says to me: but no, they are rumors, it will take years before another one comes out, I hope that the improvements compared to the S are marginal, I'm not complaining of course, I don't expect performance like my Z7ll, I already knew it before, I hope there will be a comparative review soon maybe between 100s L and ll

avatarsenior
sent on May 18, 2024 (10:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Well if you got it with the 1600€ discount, you have little to complain about...

avatarjunior
sent on May 18, 2024 (10:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

So much for sharpness! ;-)
You can read the brand of the watch: sekonda and 50 metres.
It was shot with a 500mm.

avatarsenior
sent on May 18, 2024 (13:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

More than sharpness, I would talk about the quality of detail, realism, naturalness and overall 3D perception.....

avatarjunior
sent on May 18, 2024 (16:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

That's right, Orablu and thank you: I couldn't find the words. ;-)

avatarjunior
sent on May 18, 2024 (18:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I'd say it's better not to close beyond f/11.

I'd be curious to see the pfc at F11.. One of the reasons why I stayed in APS is precisely that extra thread of PDC with the same opening.

avatarsenior
sent on May 18, 2024 (18:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I'd be curious to see the pfc at F11.. One of the reasons why I stayed in aps is just that extra pdc wire with the same aperture
I say that, that of a (for me) pseudo larger pdc from a smaller sensor, is the last of the parameters to take into account when choosing the size of a sensor...
For example: look at this one with the MF at f/4.5 that pdc that has... Moreover, at 12,800ISO...
https://i.postimg.cc/kgXDrMQ8/DSCF0439-da-R-2-19mp.jpg




Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me