What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on March 26, 2024 (15:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I would say that the darkness works quite well!
Direi che il buiotto lavora discretamente !
|
| sent on March 26, 2024 (15:47) | This comment has been translated
Marvelous shot |
| sent on March 26, 2024 (16:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Well, I wouldn't complain about the 100-500... Beh, non mi lamenterei del 100-500... |
| sent on March 26, 2024 (16:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Splendid!
And thank you for sharing the RAW as is! Splendido!
E grazie di aver condiviso il RAW as is! |
| sent on March 26, 2024 (16:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The darkness works very well, and the R5 allows cropping - if necessary - even decisive. Il buiotto lavora bene assai, e la R5 consente ritagli - all'occorrenza - anche decisi. |
| sent on March 26, 2024 (16:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Definitely good I would say ;-)
P.S.
Yesterday with friends we were trying and comparing the 100-500 vs 200-800, a friend would like to trade in the 100-500 for the 200-800 because he says he is always too short but he is undecided if the IQ of the 200-800 holds its own. Since you've used both of them yourself, what do you think? Would you make the switch? I don't see big differences like IQ both smooth Decisamente bene direi 
PS
Ieri con amici eravamo a provare e confrontare il 100-500 vs 200-800, un amico vorrebbe permutare il 100-500 per il 200-800 perché dice di essere sempre troppo corto ma è indeciso se la QI del 200-800 regge il confronto. Dato che anche tu li hai usati entrambi, cosa ne pensi? faresti il cambio? io non vedo grandi differenze come QI entrambi lisci |
| sent on March 26, 2024 (18:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Well, probably at the end of the sales the 200-800 is more advantageous, if only for the 300 mm... Of course, with the same distance from the subject and focal length (i.e. 500) the 100-500 has an extra margin on quality Beh probabilmente ai saldi finali il 200-800 è più vantaggioso, fosse solo per i 300 mm...certo a parità di distanza dal soggetto e di focale (cioè 500) ci sta che il 100-500 abbia un margine in più sulla qualità |
| sent on March 26, 2024 (18:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I think so too... See you, hello and thank you ;-) Lo penso anch'io...ci sentiamo, ciao e grazie |
| sent on March 26, 2024 (19:05) | This comment has been translated
Very nice! |
| sent on March 27, 2024 (7:31) | This comment has been translated
Beautiful, congratulations! |
| sent on March 27, 2024 (11:42)
Excellent work!
Hello: Delphinus
|
| sent on March 27, 2024 (17:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
a splendour...
The peephole in transitional plumage is also beautiful ;-) uno splendore...
bellissimo anche lo spioncello in piumaggio di transizione |
| sent on March 27, 2024 (19:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice catch. Hi Corrado Bella cattura. Ciao Corrado |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
6.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
