What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on January 12, 2025 (19:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I took a look at the gallery (not all of them I admit), this is the best for me: sharp, perfectly focused and excellent light management on the white of the chest.
Surely I can be wrong, but the photo of the Great among the trunks seems to me not in focus (the trunk on the right, behind the is in focus) and even the photo of the blue just detached / flying from the branch seems to me to be kneaded.
I find the shots of the nuthatch beautiful in terms of documentation (the "sawdust" that flutters is beautiful) but personally the branches between the camera and the subject disturb me too much. ho dato un occhio alla galleria (non tutte lo ammetto), questa è per me la migliore: nitida, perfettamente a fuoco e ottima gestione della luce sul bianco del petto.
Sicuramente posso sbagliarmi, ma la foto della Cinciallegra tra i tronchi mi pare non a fuoco (a fuoco il tronco a destra, dietro alla cincia) e anche la foto della cinciarella appena staccata /in volo dal ramo mi pare impastata.
Gli scatti del picchio muratore li trovo belli a livello documentale (bella la "segatura" che svolazza) ma personalmente i rami tra la camera il soggetto mi disturbano troppo. |
| sent on January 12, 2025 (21:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you so much LaMau. I agree that this one is much "cleaner" than the other.
But on the other hand, this is made from a shed with a manger nearby.
The other is disturbed by the branches but I am still satisfied because it was obtained from "itinerant hunting".
Some photos of the titmice, are the first experiments with the new camera and the pre-shot... Not great but they were to familiarize. Grazie mille LaMau. Concordo che questa sia molto più "pulita" dell'altra.
Ma d'altra parte questa è fatta da un capanno con una mangiatoia vicina.
L altra è disturbata dai rami ma sono comunque soddisfatto perché ottenuta da "caccia itinerante".
Alcune foto delle cincie, sono i primi esperimenti con la macchina nuova ed il pre scatto... Non sono ottime ma erano per familiarizzare. |
| sent on January 13, 2025 (9:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you very much for the reply.
I took the liberty of writing this way because I too (although not up to your photos) am still learning to properly manage the new kit, and I noticed similarities with some of my test photos.
Grazie mille per la risposta .
Mi sono permessa di scrivere così perché anche io (sebbene non all'altezza delle tue foto) sto ancora imparando a gestire correttamente il nuovo corredo, e ho notato delle similitudini con alcune mie foto test.
|
| sent on January 13, 2025 (10:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Well, to be honest you have some photos in the gallery that seem better than mine... 8-)
Anyway if you refer for example to that of the serin, I don't see the shutter speeds, but the first cause is always the same.
The birds at take-off are faster than it seems. I also don't know what camera you used but I seem to see distortion from Rolling shutter.
Anyway congratulations for the eclipse photo Beh a dirla tutta hai in galleria delle foto che mi sembrano migliori delle mie... 
Cmq se ti riferisci ad esempio a quella del verzellino, non vedo i tempi di scatto, ma la prima causa è sempre quella.
Gli uccellini al decollo sono più veloci di quello che sembra. Inoltre non so che fotocamera tu abbia usato ma mi sembra di vedere della distorsione da Rolling shutter.
Cmq complimenti per la foto dell'eclissi |
| sent on January 13, 2025 (13:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I confirm, it was dark and I had RF 100-400 Canon (on r7 that I also had very recently)
Thank you for the compliment on my gallery: I publish little and only as much as seems quite worthy to me. Think the rest (ha ha ha) Confermo, era buio e avevo RF 100-400 Canon (su r7 che avevo anche lei da pochissimo)
Ti ringrazio per il complimento sulla mia galleria: pubblico poco e solo quanto mi sembra abbastanza degno . Pensa il resto (ha ha ha) |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
20.2 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
