Mont Blanc from Curmaior

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Landscape with human elements

2.7 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

2023-2024 View gallery (13 photos)

Mont Blanc from Curmaior sent on March 09, 2024 (13:48) by Cavaadri. 4 comments, 86 views.

at 24mm, 1/125 f/20.0, ISO 125, hand held.

View High Resolution 2.7 MP

4 persons like it: Carracate, Claudio Ricci, Daniele Origgi, Hubert

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Elleemme

sent on March 09, 2024 (16:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Functional shooting point but... :
-Overall it is underexposed-A
strong tilt to the right is
evident-With f.22 you have entered diffraction - with this lens it is better to stop at f.8-f11-After
correcting the inclination it is wise to counteract the falling lines
;-)
(imho)
Hi, Lauro

Cavaadri

sent on March 09, 2024 (19:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thank you Mr. Lauro, I didn't concentrate enough, making too many mistakes, I'm sorry, because they are beautiful wasted postcards, mostly unrepeatable. After all, you get better by going from there, to the next one.

Daniele Origgi

sent on March 10, 2024 (0:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hi Adriano, in fact the big house leans a lot to the right, but the small house is straight, while the big trees and the lamppost pole (on the right) pull to the left...
In my humble opinion, more than a framing error of yours it seems to me a problem of lens distortion.
In any case, I would personally say that the postcard is not wasted and is "repeatable" with some software corrections.
Happy Sunday

Elleemme

sent on March 10, 2024 (9:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Also on the right there are the inclinations lost the center only that they are less accentuated precisely because the groove leans overall to the right we are therefore in the presence of a mix: general inclination to the right + falling lines caused by the tilting of the digital towards the top.

The major problem is that the more we lean upwards, the greater the probability that the final proportions after post production will NOT be respected :-|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.