What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 255000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on May 30, 2024 (6:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A good free hand to capture the curiosity or shyness of the subject.
Personally I think that the shooting data should have been arranged a little better, either for the shutter speed, aperture a little smaller and finally a lower sensitivity. Apart from the diaphragm where it could have been closed, the other two seem a bit high to me given the subject. Un buon mano libera a riprendere la curiosità o la timidezza del soggetto.
Personalmente penso che i dati di scatto andavano sistemati un po' meglio, vuoi per i tempi, diaframma un po' più chiuso ed infine una sensibilità inferiore . Diaframma a parte dove si poteva chiudere maggiormente gl'altri due mi sembrano un po' elevati visto il soggetto. |
| sent on May 30, 2024 (17:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Since you've spoken, tell me how you'd fix it.
Visto che ti sei espresso dimmi come avresti sistemato il tutto.
|
| sent on October 16, 2025 (23:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The image in general is beautiful, the light reflected by the white wall is too strong which makes it illegible and as written by Pigi I would have closed the diaphragm more to increase the PDC.
Bella l'immagine in generale, troppo forte la luce riflessa dal muretto bianco che lo rende illeggibile e come scritto da Pigi avrei chiuso maggiormente il diaframma per aumentare la pdc.
|
| sent on October 17, 2025 (9:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Sorry, I only saw your writing now.
“ Since you have expressed yourself, tell me how you would have fixed everything. „
First of all I would have looked for a more closed diaphragm for a greater pdc, maybe 8.
Starting from the shutter speed, considering the static subject, there was no need for such a fast shutter speed as for shooting moving subjects.
A lower sensitivity so you don't have the possibility of noise.
Finally, a more closed diaphragm to have more PDC. After the shot you looked at the display to see the result, better anchor the histogram since in some points the white of the wall is at the limit, so you could correct the parameters later always naturally if the photographed subject was still present, but this always remains the uncertainty of the type of photograph. Scusa ho visto solo ora il tuo scritto.
" Visto che ti sei espresso dimmi come avresti sistemato il tutto."
Prima di tutto avrei cercato un diaframma più chiuso per una maggiore pdc, magari 8.
Partendo dal tempo di scatto considerando il soggetto statico non vi era la necessità di un tempo così veloce come a riprendere soggetti in movimento.
Una sensibilità inferiore per non avere la possibilità del rumore.
Infine un diaframma più chiuso per avere maggiore pdc. Dopo lo scatto osservavi il display per vedere il risultato, meglio ancore l'istogramma visto che in alcuni punti il bianco del muretto è al limite, così eventualmente correggevi in seguito i parametri sempre naturalmente se il soggetto fotografato fosse ancora presente, ma questa rimane sempre l'incertezza del tipo di fotografia. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
24.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
